Teams

Sunpro-Allen

2024 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 2.5W

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-09vs Sports Mall-MortensenWon 21
L#1 DoublesMegumi Matsuzawa / Janet Despain vs Jenna DeLong / Tejaswini Vaidya2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Lillywhite vs Andrea Pia6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Cope / Rachel Allen vs Ava Conti / Olivia Moreton6-1, 6-2
2024-12-02vs Ivory Ridge-MullinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Lillywhite / Janet Despain vs Paulette Santiago / Shea McGee5-7, 5-6
2024-11-18vs Cottonwood Club-Barber/KrejciWon 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Lillywhite vs Lisa Harrison6-1, 6-1
2024-11-11vs Sunpro-Cook/DunnLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Allen / Emily Chambers vs Linsey de Guzman / Rachelle Lee1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Lillywhite vs Stephanie Webb2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Despain / Aubrey Smith vs Julia Nixon / Jen White4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-04vs Park City MARC-Llewellyn/SahlmanLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Chambers / Emily Lillywhite vs Megan Johnstone / Dania Lees1-6, 5-3, 0-1
2024-10-28vs Sports Mall-MortensenLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesEmily Lillywhite / Megumi Matsuzawa vs Annie Mortensen / Staci Dansie1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Megumi Matsuzawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Emily Lillywhite
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Jessica Cope
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Rachel Allen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.28
Janet Despain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Aubrey Smith
published 2.5
2.19
Emily Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Chambers + Jessica Cope4154% games+4.1% vs expected
Rachel Allen + Emily Lillywhite10751% games+3.3% vs expected
Rachel Allen + Emily Chambers2937% games−6.0% vs expected
Megumi Matsuzawa + Emily Lillywhite7747% games−6.9% vs expected
Megumi Matsuzawa + Emily Chambers0624% games−13.5% vs expected
Emily Chambers + Emily Lillywhite2638% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Allen + Megumi Matsuzawa3248% gamesnot enough data
Janet Despain + Emily Lillywhite224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megumi Matsuzawa
33W–52L career · 1 line in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.45
3
Emily Lillywhite
37W–67L career · 6 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44
Jessica Cope
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44
Rachel Allen
32W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
Janet Despain
16W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Aubrey Smith
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Emily Chambers
18W–58L career · 1 line in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
Joshua Janine Gabriel McClory
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.