Teams

Parkland - Les

2021 Broward Adult 40 & Over - Spring Night · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-02-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Hoaglin / Brian Stephanak vs Vincent Salazar / Mark Elderkin6-4, 6-4
2021-02-09vs Midtown - IsmaelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Williams / Charles Johnson II vs Juan Pablo Rincon / PEDRO REGGIARDO1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristian Reyes / Eli Panell vs Felipe Soto / Ismael Rosales6-3, 6-3
2021-02-02vs Piccolo - DeAndreis/SanchezWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharles Johnson II / David Williams vs Carlos Haupt / Stanley Tsung6-4, 6-2
2021-01-26vs Wtc - Tejeda/EcheverriaWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Hoaglin / Brian Stephanak vs Ruben Caramaschi / Nelson Laboy6-0, 6-0
2021-01-19vs Jetc - CundyWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Williams / Charles Johnson II vs Paul Muldoon / Johan Johnson6-4, 6-4
2021-01-12vs Parkland - NobletSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEli Panell / Ronen Bickel vs Thomas Wickwire / Jaime Cosculluela6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristopher Staller vs Radu Carean0-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Ronen Bickel
published
4.24
Evan David
published 4.5
4.12
Christopher Staller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
David Williams
published 4.5
3.97
3.93
Paul Newman
published
3.85
Eli Panell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Charles Johnson II
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
William Hoaglin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Les Liese
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Johnson II + Eli Panell5069% gamesnot enough data
Charles Johnson II + William Hoaglin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ronen Bickel
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Evan David
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Christopher Staller
12W–5L career · type D · 1 line in 2021
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
David Williams
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Adalberto Taguchi
34W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.97
Paul Newman
34W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Eli Panell
176W–98L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Charles Johnson II
147W–86L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.81
William Hoaglin
63W–69L career · 2 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Les Liese
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.