Teams

Leon/Pool/18&Over4.0M

2023 Leon Adult 18 & Over · 4.0M Adult 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-28vs Morris (Tom Brown)Won 10
W#1 DoublesIra Simons / Riley Pool vs Andrew Morris / Bill Kirchhoff6-3, 6-3
2023-06-21vs Morris (Tom Brown)Won 30
W#1 DoublesPatrick Swanson / Harsha Panasa vs Andrew Sabolic / Arthur Wahl6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWilliam Baldock / Justin Bates vs Nick Frampton / Brett Bacot7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIra Simons / Riley Pool vs Krishnan Viswanathan / FRANCISCO SUAREZ NAVARRO6-3, 6-2
2023-06-14vs Morris (Tom Brown)Won 10
W#1 DoublesIra Simons / William Baldock vs Prakash Mohan / Andrew Sabolic6-2, 7-5
2023-05-24vs Morris (Tom Brown)Won 30
W#1 DoublesPatrick Swanson / Riley Pool vs Andrew Morris / Prakash Mohan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIra Simons / Thomas Curry vs Arthur Wahl / Nick Frampton6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesWilliam Baldock vs Andrew Sabolic7-5, 6-2
2023-05-17vs Morris (Tom Brown)Won 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Baldock / Coy Chambers vs Krishnan Viswanathan / FRANCISCO SUAREZ NAVARRO6-3, 7-5
2023-05-10vs Morris (Tom Brown)Won 10
W#2 DoublesIra Simons / William Baldock vs Brett Bacot / Prakash Mohan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-05-03vs Morris (Tom Brown)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesIra Simons / Thomas Curry vs Brian Bellamy / Andrew Sabolic3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0M Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Patrick Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.03
Harsha Panasa
published 4
3.88
William Baldock
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Riley Pool
published
3.78
Michael Tanzy
published
3.67
Coy Chambers
published 4
3.55
Ira Simons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harsha Panasa + William Baldock6263% games+6.1% vs expected
Ira Simons + William Baldock21760% games+0.1% vs expected
Patrick Swanson + Ira Simons404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Patrick Swanson
66W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Harsha Panasa
80W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
William Baldock
83W–36L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Riley Pool
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.85
Michael Tanzy
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Coy Chambers
71W–99L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Ira Simons
111W–77L career · 6 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.