Teams

Just for Fun 3.5

2025 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-21vs String Theory 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeremy Bloom / Matthew Bent vs Scott Kahan / Dayve Forman6-2, 6-1
2025-06-19Won 20
W#1 SinglesMatthew Bent vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBo Liang / Kurubel Asgedom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-04vs EC F'N WLost 01
L#1 SinglesKurubel Asgedom vs Juan Martinez Guzman1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesKurubel Asgedom / Bo Liang vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-17vs Smiles and Laughs 18+3.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesMatthew Bent vs Chungfu Yang6-3, 6-0
2025-05-04vs Game Changers 3.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bent / Mark Tyler vs Jaeseong Lee / Jaeil Ahn2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKurubel Asgedom / Wei Fu vs Hyung Joon Kwon / Na Kim4-6, 6-7
2025-04-26vs I'd Hit That 18+ 3.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesMatthew Bent vs Surendra Babu6-1, 6-4
2025-04-13vs EC F'N WWon 10
W#1 DoublesKameron Hnath / Matthew Bent vs Myles Baldwin / Parmvir Singh6-1, 7-5
2025-04-09vs Les Ballers 3.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMatthew Bent vs Mike Ly6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Matthew Bent
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.53
Peter Zhu
published
3.50
Louis Fung
published
3.49
Jeremy Bloom
published
3.38
Jun Hee Kim
published
3.23
Xiao Liu
published
3.18
Kameron Hnath
published
3.15
Mark Tyler
published
3.10
Kurubel Asgedom
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.96
Wei Fu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Bo Liang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Eddie Gao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ping-Jung Liu
published
Zeyang Shen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Bent + Jeremy Bloom3251% games−2.9% vs expected
Eddie Gao + Bo Liang224 matchesnot enough data
Louis Fung + Mark Tyler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Matthew Bent
58W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Peter Zhu
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Louis Fung
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jeremy Bloom
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Jun Hee Kim
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Xiao Liu
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kameron Hnath
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Mark Tyler
26W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
3
Kurubel Asgedom
34W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Wei Fu
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Bo Liang
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Eddie Gao
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Ping-Jung Liu
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zeyang Shen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.