Teams

PD55/Poole/FTC

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over - PD · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-19vs PD55/Grant-Cassidy/BYPLost 12
W#1 DoublesCrystal Rogers / Trina Stephens vs Tracie Cassidy / Shannon Grant7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Moore / Audrey Hyman vs Jeannie Gainey / Shelly Brand2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRita Wilhelm / Ming Xia vs Alicia Ross / Kellie Braddock4-6, 3-6
2026-04-13vs PD55/Dukes/PTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRita Wilhelm / Margaret Ann Mansell vs Marie Player / Beth Reames0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Edwards / Lyrae Rogers vs Lynn Dukes / Paige Weiland4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulieanne Yarnal / Meg Brunson vs Mary Lisa McGill / Denise Weeks1-6, 2-6
2026-03-29vs PD 3.5W 55 & Over (Graham)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLyrae Rogers / Jennifer Edwards vs Betsy Graham / Jody Murphy4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMargaret Ann Mansell / Trina Stephens vs Lyndy Graham / LouAnn Williams6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJayne Boswell / Meg Brunson vs Allison Patrick / Donna Rivers6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-08vs PD (W) 3.5W 55 & Over (Siegal)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Moore / Rita Wilhelm vs Pat Pitiranggon / Angela Lorenz1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Edwards / Lyrae Rogers vs Robin Siegal / Evelyn Goforth2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJayne Boswell / Linda Freeman vs Melissa Ellerbe / Ophillia Dominique2-6, 2-6
2026-03-01vs PD55/Dukes/PTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesCrystal Rogers / Trina Stephens vs Gwen McElveen / Beth Reames4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJayne Boswell / Lyrae Rogers vs Paige Weiland / Christine Sari6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Ann Mansell / Nancy Moore vs Mary Lisa McGill / Denise Weeks3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-25vs PD55/Grant-Cassidy/BYPWon 21
L#1 DoublesAudrey Hyman / Nancy Moore vs Tracie Cassidy / Shannon Grant0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Edwards / Lyrae Rogers vs Jeannie Gainey / Gee Whetsel7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeg Brunson / Linda Freeman vs Kellie Braddock / Susan Brown7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-17vs PD 3.5W 55 & Over (Graham)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Berry / Lyrae Rogers vs Kay Zobrist / Raquel Lastimoso0-2
L#2 DoublesLinda Freeman / Sandy Trexler vs Allison Patrick / Donna Rivers3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Edwards / Audrey Hyman vs Lyndy Graham / Jean Witt2-6, 1-6
2026-02-01vs PD (W) 3.5W 55 & Over (Siegal)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Trexler / Rita Wilhelm vs Pat Pitiranggon / Robin Siegal5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMeg Brunson / Ellen Berry vs Kristen Perkins / Lorraine Tindal4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Freeman / Jennifer Edwards vs Vontella Kennedy-James / Kathleen Stedman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Margaret Ann Mansell
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Jayne Boswell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Rita Wilhelm
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Audrey Hyman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Trina Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Lyrae Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Nancy Moore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.76
Linda Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Julieanne Yarnal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Meg Brunson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.64
Sandy Trexler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Moore + Rita Wilhelm4649% games+2.1% vs expected
Linda Freeman + Lyrae Rogers3346% games−4.7% vs expected
Sandy Trexler + Nancy Moore404 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Moore + Audrey Hyman134 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Trexler + Linda Freeman213 matchesnot enough data
Julieanne Yarnal + Meg Brunson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Ann Mansell
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.03
Jayne Boswell
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Rita Wilhelm
10W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
3.5
Audrey Hyman
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.93
Trina Stephens
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
Lyrae Rogers
8W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.91
Nancy Moore
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Linda Freeman
20W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Julieanne Yarnal
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Meg Brunson
9W–15L career · 10 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Sandy Trexler
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.