Teams

Lakewood 3.5

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.43 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-08vs Manor 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAudrey Wasser / Cindy Pohoryles vs Diana DePaul / Theda Graham4-6, 0-6
2023-02-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesAudrey Wasser / Cindy Pohoryles vs Jill Silverberg Wiener / Cheryl Battan6-1, 6-3
2023-01-31vs Out of OfficeLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Dobson / Cindy Pohoryles vs Stephanie Schuerman / Corrina McGlone3-6, 2-6
2023-01-11vs MoCo SnowballsLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Pohoryles / Maite Leo vs Jennifer Sheehan / Kelly Treacy1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Rebecca Hammond
published
3.47
Jody Sklar
published
3.38
Linda Blumenreich
published
3.37
STEFANIE RUVO
published
3.36
Corinne Boisi
published 3.5
3.34
Elizabeth Votaw
published 3.5
Alisa Talisman
published 3.5
Anne Porto
published 3.5
Carol Maio
published 3.5
3.25
Alison Wang
published 3.5
3.21
Robin Barron
published
2.87
Julie Dobson
published
2.75
Cindy Pohoryles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Maite Leo
published
2.63
Pamela Gambon
published
Audrey Wasser
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Hammond
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
Jody Sklar
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Linda Blumenreich
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.38
STEFANIE RUVO
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Corinne Boisi
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Elizabeth Votaw
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Alisa Talisman
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Anne Porto
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carol Maio
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Alison Wang
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Robin Barron
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Julie Dobson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Cindy Pohoryles
56W–96L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Maite Leo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Pamela Gambon
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
2.63
Audrey Wasser
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.