Teams

Pa.Vickers18S

2025 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-15vs Jo.Anderson18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesPatrick Vickers vs Stephen Mungenast6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJosh Dellinger vs Chris Selfani6-2, 6-1
2025-10-08vs Ra.Yasin18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesChristian Guthrie vs Paul Sherman6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesRyan Catrine vs Willie Frierson7-5, 7-5
2025-09-24vs Ro.Harris18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesAustin Council vs PEDRO J LEON4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-17vs De.Farmer18S3.0Won 30
W#1 SinglesAustin Council vs Adrian Williams6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesChristian Guthrie vs Kamal Gurung6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRyan Catrine vs Dipendra Shrestha6-1, 6-3
2025-09-10vs Jo.Anderson18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesRyan Catrine vs Bryan Kohan6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChristian Guthrie vs Jody Anderson6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesPatrick Vickers vs Stephen Mungenast6-0, 6-1
2025-09-03vs Ra.Yasin18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChristian Guthrie vs Andrew Adams6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAustin Council vs Pearson Wynands6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-20vs Ro.Harris18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesRyan Catrine vs Patrick Dougherty6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesPatrick Vickers vs Adam Daniels6-0, 6-3
2025-08-13vs De.Farmer18S3.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesAustin Council vs Kamal Gurung6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJosh Dellinger vs Raymond Cox3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesChristian Guthrie vs Adrian Williams6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Christian Guthrie
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
3.20
Ryan Catrine
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
3.08
Josh Dellinger
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
3.06
Austin Council
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.95
Patrick Vickers
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Noah Marley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Vickers + Austin Council3259% games+6.6% vs expected
Patrick Vickers + Josh Dellinger92142% games−10.8% vs expected
Josh Dellinger + Austin Council3549% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Vickers + Ryan Catrine213 matchesnot enough data
Josh Dellinger + Christian Guthrie303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christian Guthrie
81W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
3
Ryan Catrine
56W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.20
3
Josh Dellinger
77W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Austin Council
47W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Patrick Vickers
62W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Noah Marley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.