Teams

Naples Reserve - D. Keely

2021 Collier Mixed 55 & Over Fall · 2021 Mixed 55 & over 7.0 Fall

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-12-12vs Fall Winners - Marco YMCA - GauchWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeggy Keigley / David Ray vs Stephanie Opel / Marco Arilli1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-12-05vs Cambier - DelongeLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeggy Keigley / David Ray vs Phillip McKee / Carole Boivin2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2020-11-28vs Players Club - BifaroWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeggy Keigley / David Ray vs Larry Addabbo / Patrice Clapacs6-4, 6-3
2020-11-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Ray / Peggy Keigley vs Gina McAveeney / Jim McAveeney3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2020-11-01vs Fall Winners - Marco YMCA - GauchLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeggy Keigley / David Ray vs Kelly Heintzelman / Andy Mintz3-6, 0-6
2020-10-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Ray / Peggy Keigley vs Mark Johnson / Fay Brett6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2021 Mixed 55 & over 7.0 Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Ray
published 4
3.51
David Keely
published 3.5
3.47
Connie Johnson
published 3.5
3.24
Marianne Gaffney
published
3.18
Linda Keely
published
Jeff Rothe
published
Jonathan Kaylor
published
Maria Riccio
published
Mark Garrett
published
Peggy Keigley
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Stan Britton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Keely + David Keely2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Ray
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
David Keely
32W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Connie Johnson
16W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.47
Marianne Gaffney
19W–27L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Linda Keely
11W–22L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Jeff Rothe
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jonathan Kaylor
12W–16L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maria Riccio
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Garrett
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peggy Keigley
92W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stan Britton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.