Teams

Detonators-Billups

2025 Fredericksburg Adult 55 & Over · Fredericksburg Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-05vs CFAC-AlfordSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCurtis Harris / George Smith vs John Long / David Berg3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Noi / David Bryant vs Chris Robinson / Martin Crawford6-3, 6-2
2025-03-04vs CFAC-AlfordLost 03
L#1 DoublesCurtis Harris / George Smith vs Richard Gerhardt / Hugh Langford5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTrent Billups / Stephen Klein vs David Berg / Tim Alford1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlex Noi / Tim Drake vs Glenn Hall / Bahram Solhjou6-7, 3-6
2025-03-02vs CFAC-AlfordLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephen Klein / David Bryant vs James Stamps / Peter Schmidt3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTim Drake / Alex Noi vs John Long / Hugh Langford2-6, 0-6
2025-02-23vs CFAC-AlfordLost 12
L#1 DoublesTrent Billups / George Smith vs Bahram Solhjou / Peter Schmidt2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTim Drake / Dale Kadlec vs Tim Alford / Martin Crawford0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Bryant / Stephen Klein vs David Berg / Glenn Hall6-4, 6-2
2025-02-02vs CFAC-AlfordLost 03
L#1 DoublesTrent Billups / George Smith vs John Long / Tim Alford4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCurtis Harris / Dale Kadlec vs David Berg / Hugh Langford5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Bryant / Tim Drake vs James Stamps / Chris Robinson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-12vs CFAC-AlfordLost 03
L#1 DoublesCurtis Harris / George Smith vs David Berg / Tim Alford1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTrent Billups / Stephen Klein vs James Stamps / Bahram Solhjou1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTim Drake / Antonio Garcia vs Richard Gerhardt / Hugh Langford2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Curtis Harris
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Alex Noi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
David Bryant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Dale Kadlec
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Stephen Klein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tim Drake
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Trent Billups
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Curtis Harris
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Alex Noi
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Bryant
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dale Kadlec
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Klein
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Drake
1W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trent Billups
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.