Teams

Break Point Tennis - 1

2022 40&Over Mixed · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-07-06vs Break Point Tennis - ALost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Stone / Lynne Maggio vs Mark Melton / Leah Aizen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFrank McConville / Kim McConville vs Dan Stone / Liz Harrington2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBing Yang / Lachele Coninx-Wiley vs Spike Vrusho / Kasey Reynolds1-6, 0-6
2022-06-18vs Cross Court: Go For Broke IILost 03
L#1 DoublesLynne Maggio / Carl Zatz vs Christina Bookless / Erwin Watson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKim Cantine / David Held vs Diana Regini / Kirk Allen0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLachele Coninx-Wiley / Robert Stone vs Christine Casey-Charter / Gregory Lenyszyn0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cross Court: Go For Broke II2051221
2Break Point Tennis - A1142435
3Taconic: Iconic Taconics000000
4Break Point Tennis - 102061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Shawn Holzmann
published
2.77
Richelle Gaceta
published 3
David Held
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Andrea Mondello
published 3
2.50
Lachele Coninx-Wiley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Bing Yang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.32
Kim Cantine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carl Zatz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Charlie Rubin
published
Kim McConville
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Stone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn Holzmann
60W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
3
Richelle Gaceta
48W–60L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
David Held
1W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
Andrea Mondello
23W–48L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54
Lachele Coninx-Wiley
28W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%49%51%
2.50
3
Bing Yang
10W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.41
Kim Cantine
21W–58L career · 1 line in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.32
2.5
Carl Zatz
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Charlie Rubin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim McConville
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Robert Stone
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.