Teams

Ni.Thomas18A

2026 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-24vs Ca.WilliamsAden18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesClaire See / Danielle Boone vs Brooke Russ / Jaimie Haas0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDiane Pokorney vs Mary Hannah Andrews6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Vickers / Megan Wilkinson vs Heidi Suke / Azita Amini6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-17vs Je.Glennon18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Seward / Nina Thomas vs Jordan Barratt / Kimberly Castro0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Vickers vs Nan Winborne2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoey Elphick / Jessy Ellis vs Elizabeth Boyette / Dalton Hunt7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-04-10vs Lo.Stevens18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesMaryAdelaide Riddick / Jessica Vickers vs Diane Maginnis / Kristie Clontz0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDiane Pokorney vs Kimberly Roth2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoey Elphick / Sarah Seward vs Sharon Regnier / Kathy Estrada1-6, 1-6
2026-03-27vs Em.Boyer18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesJenna Foley / Megan Wilkinson vs Emily Boyer / Natalie Mayur0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDevany Ayers vs Caroline Bell-luehrs1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNina Thomas / Jessy Ellis vs Jennifer Booth / Kelly Norman6-7, 4-6
2026-03-20vs Me.Frost18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesClaire See / Kelly Smith vs Ashley Woolley / Lauren Watson4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDanielle Boone vs Beth Stagner1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHaley Wetmore / Megan Wilkinson vs Kate Mullis / Jill Triana3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-13vs Te.Marcott18ALost 12
W#1 DoublesMaryAdelaide Riddick / Megan Wilkinson vs Heather Jones / Cindy Markham6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDevany Ayers vs Ann Flores2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesHaley Wetmore / Jenna Foley vs Heidi Doyle / Elizabeth Kirby2-6, 2-6
2026-03-06vs Co.Hicks18A2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Pokorney / Nina Thomas vs Tucker Andrews / Mary Margaret Ross1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMaryAdelaide Riddick vs Kaitlyn Floyd6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoey Elphick / Jessy Ellis vs Courtney Hicks / Blair Cobb4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1La.Hampton18A8020411125
2Ch.Wellman18A7017410131
3Ca.WilliamsAden18A6115615152
4Me.Frost18A6114717163
5La.Gentile18A6219512135
6Az.Bell18A6216816158
7Br.Robinson18A6216821200
8El.Robinson18A62141021167
9Co.Hicks18A2.55214715144
10Je.Tyndall18A5213818153
11Em.Boyer18A4313817156
12Te.Marcott18A43101123187
13Me.Dougher18A43111024192
14Ma.Harber18A43111024185
15Ja.Stephan18A44131123187
16Ke.Hurter18A3311716129
17Be.Pitt18A3412920161
18Da.Louzao18A3481327198
19Mo.Lewis18A35111329214
20Mo.Weimer18A35101431235
21Ka.Manooch18A2571428201
22Lo.Stevens18A2581329199
23Ra.Rosen18A2571432225
24Ma.Evans18A2691532234
25Jo.Johnson18A2691533237
26Am.Brandon18A2661836224
27Di.Harper18A1531530193
28Je.Glennon18A1661531214
29Ni.Thomas18A0741736227
30Ka.Marotta18A0832142266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.36
Megan Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Diane Pokorney
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.34
MaryAdelaide Riddick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.27
Jessy Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Jessica Vickers
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.04
Devany Ayers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.02
Claire See
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.95
Danielle Boone
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.85
Haley Wetmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.82
Jenna Foley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.81
Nina Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.62
Joey Elphick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Seward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Wilkinson
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Diane Pokorney
2W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
MaryAdelaide Riddick
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Jessy Ellis
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Jessica Vickers
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Devany Ayers
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Claire See
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Danielle Boone
1W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Haley Wetmore
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Jenna Foley
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Nina Thomas
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Joey Elphick
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.62
Sarah Seward
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.