Teams

Fr.Burbano18S

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-19Lost 01
L#2 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs Flynn Jones6-7, 1-6
2023-07-12vs Ma.Gentry18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesAlessandro Montanari vs AP Blake6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs Nipul Shah6-0, 6-2
2023-07-06Won 10
W#2 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs Edgar Harrell6-4, 7-6
2023-06-28vs De.Byrd18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesFrancisco Burbano vs Clay Fussell6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs PHI PHAM1-6, 6-7
2023-06-14Won 10
W#2 SinglesAlessandro Montanari vs Andrew Perry6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2023-05-31vs Pa.Dougherty18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs Patrick Dougherty3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-24vs Ma.Gentry18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesAlessandro Montanari vs AP Blake7-5, 6-3
W#3 SinglesFrancisco Burbano vs Geoff Fuller6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Michael Ratliff
published
3.15
Francisco Burbano
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Joseph Williamson
published
2.98
Alessandro Montanari
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.94
Richard Johnson
published
2.88
Todd Sprouse
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.69
David McNulty
published 3
2.65
Peter Flack
published
Vaibhav Parmar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alessandro Montanari + Joseph Williamson5061% games+7.2% vs expected
Peter Flack + Joseph Williamson3254% games+3.8% vs expected
Todd Sprouse + Francisco Burbano6454% gamesnot enough data
Todd Sprouse + Alessandro Montanari4450% gamesnot enough data
Todd Sprouse + David McNulty134 matchesnot enough data
Alessandro Montanari + Francisco Burbano134 matchesnot enough data
Francisco Burbano + Michael Ratliff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Ratliff
23W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Francisco Burbano
79W–81L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Joseph Williamson
24W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Alessandro Montanari
102W–89L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
2.98
Richard Johnson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Todd Sprouse
85W–98L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
David McNulty
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
Peter Flack
11W–21L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
Vaibhav Parmar
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.