Teams

QRRC-Trubee

2026 OH OV SUMMER Combo · 8.5 Combo Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-09vs KTC-GillWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Hall / Collin McAndrew vs Chase Buttery / Tyler Poe6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJonathan Scherquist / Antonio Williams vs Robert Rittwage / Carter Tisdale7-5, 6-2
2026-07-12vs KTC-GillWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Peyton / Matt Clouse vs Robert Rittwage / Samuel Garay6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLuke Trubee / Nicholas Quiroz vs Chase Buttery / Tyler Poe6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCollin McAndrew / Antonio Williams vs Andrew Knutson / Bradley Paynter6-4, 6-4
2026-06-14vs KTC-GillWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Hall / Nicholas Quiroz vs Andrew Knutson / Kasen Watz7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Peyton / Collin McAndrew vs Chase Buttery / Tyler Poe6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDarrin Heinz / Luke Trubee vs Robert Rittwage / Gary Gill7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Darrin Heinz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
David Peyton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Jonathan Scherquist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Jason Merkle
published 4.5
4.10
Luke Trubee
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.10
Collin McAndrew
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.98
Nicholas Quiroz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Matt Clouse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Antonio Williams
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Clouse + Jason Merkle7258% games+2.0% vs expected
David Peyton + Darrin Heinz4166% gamesnot enough data
Darrin Heinz + Jason Merkle314 matchesnot enough data
David Peyton + Matt Clouse303 matchesnot enough data
David Peyton + Collin McAndrew303 matchesnot enough data
Matt Clouse + Luke Trubee303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Darrin Heinz
66W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
4.44
4.5
David Peyton
62W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
4.42
Jonathan Scherquist
40W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Jason Merkle
196W–91L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
Luke Trubee
101W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
4.10
4
Collin McAndrew
61W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
4.10
Nicholas Quiroz
75W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
Matt Clouse
49W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Antonio Williams
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.