Teams

San Jose - Boehm (MU)

2022 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-26vs Oakleaf - HartleyWon 10
W#1 SinglesJoseph Travers vs David Randolph7-6, 6-3
2022-03-19vs Julington Creek - BassLost 01
L#3 DoublesTroy Bryant / Matt Braun vs Thomas Bass / Thomas Prouty6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-03-05vs Eagle HarborLost 01
L#1 SinglesJoseph Travers vs Michael Waroff4-6, 3-6
2022-02-12vs Ponte Vedra - BryantLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndres Gutierrez / Joseph Travers vs John Kirkley / Kevin Crismond4-6, 1-6
2022-02-05vs DUVAL - San Jose - MorganLost 02
L#1 SinglesJoseph Travers vs David Paul2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndres Gutierrez / Matt Braun vs Flavio Soares / Mark Chaffin2-6, 4-6
2022-01-15vs Oakleaf - HartleySplit 11
L#1 SinglesJoseph Travers vs David Randolph3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMatt Braun / Troy Bryant vs Rudy Ignacio / Warren Malcom6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Andres Gutierrez
published 4.5
4.23
Matt Braun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.16
Ramon Bescansa
published
3.97
Eric Leach
published 4.5
3.94
Eduardo Andrade
published 4
3.68
Stephan Abraham
published
3.52
Patrick Regan
published
3.50
Joseph Travers
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.45
John Setzler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Regan + Matt Braun123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andres Gutierrez
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.36
Matt Braun
93W–73L career · 10 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Ramon Bescansa
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Eric Leach
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Eduardo Andrade
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
Stephan Abraham
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Patrick Regan
47W–51L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Joseph Travers
41W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Hans Vanden Noort
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.45
John Setzler
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.