Teams

RCSP Schwerin

2025 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulia Schwerin / Jessica Gary vs Penny Hunter / Maryl Holley6-2, 6-3
2025-06-07vs Pinellas/Bryan/40&Over3.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Schwerin / Jessica Gary vs Paula Kastenson / Patricia Aliak4-6, 1-6
2025-05-27vs SPTC Holliday 3.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Saari / Julia Schwerin vs Christine Marascio / Martha Chapman2-6, 2-6
2025-05-17vs Tarpon CoyotesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Schwerin / Connie Yilmaz vs Becky Kuntz / Brook Houck3-6, 4-6
2025-05-03vs Seminole Lake Jordan OverservedLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulia Schwerin / Jessica Gary vs Michele Girardi / Valeska Dykes2-6, 3-6
2025-04-26vs McMullen PronatorsWon 31
W#1 DoublesJessica Gary / Susan Barham vs Maria Calderon / Janice Berman6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDetsy Hallock vs Carol Melber6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlissa Moyer / Kim Gallman vs Deepa Rice / Maria C Cadena-Krone6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKrista Healy / Amy Braswell vs Mary Garrido / Nancy Baron6-4, 6-4
2025-04-19vs SPTC FireballsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Schwerin / Jessica Gary vs Kelly Bernish / Abby Sterensis6-3, 6-0
2025-04-12vs McMullen KosarWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulia Schwerin / Susan Barham vs Karen Leary / Lauren Lelewski5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-05vs Seminole Lake Dsa 3.0 WWon 30
W#1 DoublesZhanna Thomas / Susan Barham vs Inna Rand / Jessica Spravaka7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKrista Healy vs Jennifer Anderson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesConnie Yilmaz / Nancy Saari vs Gladys Nunamaker / Marianne Banales6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Krista Healy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.85
Sara Armstrong
published
2.81
Alissa Moyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Julia Schwerin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.70
Susan Barham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Connie Yilmaz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Detsy Hallock
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Amy Braswell
published 2.5
Zhanna Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Krista Healy
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Sara Armstrong
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Alissa Moyer
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Julia Schwerin
34W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Susan Barham
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Connie Yilmaz
11W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Detsy Hallock
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Amy Braswell
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zhanna Thomas
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.