Teams

Lee

Adult 18 & Over Summer · 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.42 / DELAWARE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-23vs Zero Drama 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesMelinda Lee / Alison Harrison vs Doris Kerr / Stephanie Hoffmann6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSusan Johnson vs Emily Serwo7-6, 6-1
2022-06-18vs Zero Drama 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesMelinda Lee / Kristina Alling vs Christine Bendinelli / Sandra Parcells6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlison Harrison / Madeline Griffin vs Doris Kerr / Colleen Dumas6-3, 6-4
2022-06-17vs Zero Drama 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesAlison Harrison / Laura Travis vs Dehlia Dunn / Charlene Massih6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMelinda Lee / Kristina Alling vs Joyce Shiau / Amanda Laskowski7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-11vs Zero Drama 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Travis / Alison Harrison vs Diane Maund / Susan Dixon Thompson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Shaw / Melinda Lee vs Lisa Wilson / Laura Capuano6-2, 6-2
2022-06-02vs Zero Drama 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Travis / Cindy Wieczorek vs Jill Wallace / Stephanie Hoffmann6-0, 6-0
2022-05-22vs Zero Drama 4.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesMarina Giolas / Madeline Griffin vs Susan Dixon Thompson / Colleen Dumas7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelinda Lee / Elaina Lee vs Laura Capuano / Lisa Wilson6-1, 6-3
2022-05-12vs Zero Drama 4.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesPamela Vail vs Kayoko Hollinger6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarina Giolas / Melinda Lee vs Stephanie Hoffmann / Jennifer Horne6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAlison Harrison / Amanda-Leigh Hall vs Colleen Dumas / Jen Andrisani6-4, 6-1
2022-05-05vs Zero Drama 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Travis / Kristina Alling vs Amanda Laskowski / Laura Capuano6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarina Giolas / Susan Johnson vs Diane Maund / Susan Dixon Thompson6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Greta Koch
published 4.5
4.38
Pamela Vail
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.37
Laura Travis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.31
Kallie Speller
published
Alison Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Jacqueline Shaw
published 4.5
4.22
Kristina Alling
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Beth Rickard
published 4.5
4.18
Melinda Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Marina Giolas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Lauren Park
published
Stephanie Sposato
published
Susan Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Tetiana Sawchak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Travis + Alison Harrison9075% games+22.1% vs expected
Kristina Alling + Melinda Lee25560% games+3.1% vs expected
Susan Johnson + Kristina Alling314 matchesnot enough data
Beth Rickard + Jacqueline Shaw303 matchesnot enough data
Alison Harrison + Melinda Lee303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jasmine Nichole Shaw-Morris
24W–24L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.66
4.5
Greta Koch
29W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
4.39
Pamela Vail
93W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%82%17%
4.38
Laura Travis
25W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
4.37
Kallie Speller
31W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Alison Harrison
49W–15L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jacqueline Shaw
54W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Kristina Alling
161W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Beth Rickard
92W–45L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
Melinda Lee
106W–45L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.18
4
Marina Giolas
185W–151L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Lauren Park
104W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Sposato
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Johnson
61W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tetiana Sawchak
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.