Teams

Gibson/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Tri-Level 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Shrev

17 players · average NTRP 2.83 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#2 DoublesElisha Coats / Valarie Thiels vs Caroline Hand / Jennifer Octavi2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Gibson / Meredith Graf vs Ruby DeAlba / Christiana Lyons6-3, 6-0
2026-07-10vs Prudhome/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/BTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesHeather Floyd / Aubree Bunyard vs Kim Smith / Jenny Rodgers6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMeredith Graf / Kaitlin Wood vs Valerie Barcelona / Hannah Matheny6-2, 6-3
2026-07-03vs Watters/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/POTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesValarie Thiels / Heather Floyd vs Laura Love / Shani Crawford5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Gibson / Kaitlin Wood vs Molly Phares / Megan Pearce2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-26vs Hand/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/CTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHeather Floyd / Elisha Coats vs Heidi Kallenberg / Robin Morgan6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaura Cope / Monica Helm vs Mary-taylor Soley / Carla Austin5-7, 2-6
2026-06-19vs Cummer/18/3-3.5-4/TWD/POTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesRachael Deere / Valarie Thiels vs Mary Jayroe / Amy Knotts6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaitlin Wood / Monica Helm vs Sandrine Brown / Ainsley Rutkowski7-6, 6-3
2026-06-11vs Wray/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/STCCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHeather Floyd / Valarie Thiels vs Mona Cunningham / Christina Stage4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Gibson / Laura Cope vs Cayce Cloud / Shannon Davidson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAllison Santos / Valarie Thiels vs Rhonda Rubben / Laura Gooszen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Brasher / Kristin McCoy vs Kay Holland / Cheryl Wagg6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Gibson / Monica Helm vs Becca Barber / Stefanie Breaux2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-29vs Mitchell/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/POTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesValarie Thiels / Leslie Brasher vs Shayne Bryan / Lindsey Cotton6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeredith Graf / Laura Cope vs Meghan Slusher / Nikki Hanna6-4, 6-4
2026-05-22vs Gullatt-Roll/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/STCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesChandni Chatrath / Monica Helm vs Holyn Kosh / Emily Smithwick6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mitchell/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/POTC8121618192
2Gibson/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/BTC81171025217
3Prudhome/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/BTC7219819195
4Watters/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/POTC63141328245
5Navarre/Price/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/QTC54161126206
6Cooper-Gifford/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/STCC45111632232
7Wray/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/STCC45131433246
8Hand/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/CTC2791839273
9Gordon/18/2.5-3.5/TWD/POTC1881940287
10Gullatt-Roll/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/STCC0972044298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Ene Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Rachael Deere
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Lora Slack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Gina Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kim Kitchens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Valarie Thiels
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Leslie Brasher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Heather Floyd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Aubree Bunyard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Kristin McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.72
Amanda Urian
published 3
2.70
Elisha Coats
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Meredith Graf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Kaitlin Wood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Jacqueline Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Laura Cope
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Chandni Chatrath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Gibson + Kaitlin Wood11851% games+7.1% vs expected
Valarie Thiels + Heather Floyd16658% games+5.2% vs expected
Ene Wang + Gina Robinson314 matchesnot enough data
Valarie Thiels + Aubree Bunyard224 matchesnot enough data
Lora Slack + Rachael Deere123 matchesnot enough data
Ene Wang + Rachael Deere303 matchesnot enough data
Kristin McCoy + Aubree Bunyard123 matchesnot enough data
Valarie Thiels + Jacqueline Gibson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ene Wang
60W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Rachael Deere
66W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Lora Slack
34W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Gina Robinson
30W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Kim Kitchens
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Valarie Thiels
74W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Leslie Brasher
41W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Heather Floyd
59W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Aubree Bunyard
43W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Kristin McCoy
21W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Amanda Urian
22W–18L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Elisha Coats
43W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Meredith Graf
17W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%11%89%
2.67
Kaitlin Wood
41W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Jacqueline Gibson
31W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Laura Cope
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Chandni Chatrath
9W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.