Teams

TZimmer (PPRSC)

2026 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Men - Tues PM

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-21vs MPease/KChapman (Piper Glen)Won 21
L#1 SinglesCraig Menninger vs Matthew Wellman5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDonald Ford II vs Ross Berger6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesScott Zimmer vs Nolan Kelker7-5, 6-2
2026-07-14vs MHall (Raintree)Split 11
L#2 SinglesTrevor Zimmer vs Jared Horton7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesChuck Norton vs Arnoldo Marquez6-2, 7-5
2026-07-07vs PTighe (Blakeney)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesCraig Menninger vs PATRICK TIGHE6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDonald Ford II vs Gustavo Paravela7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesChuck Norton vs Douglas Harrison3-6, 5-7
2026-06-30vs MPease/KChapman (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTrevor Zimmer vs Michael Pease7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-06-23vs MHall (Raintree)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesCraig Menninger vs Brady Koesel3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesScott Zimmer vs Jared Horton6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesDonald Ford II vs Robert Spalding2-6, 3-6
2026-06-16vs PTighe (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCraig Menninger vs Gustavo Paravela7-6, 6-2
2026-06-09vs MPease/KChapman (Piper Glen)Won 21
L#1 SinglesChuck Norton vs Matthew Wellman2-6, 0-0
W#2 SinglesTrevor Zimmer vs Ross Berger6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDonald Ford II vs Nolan Kelker7-6, 6-3
2026-06-04vs PTighe (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 SinglesScott Zimmer vs Indranil Bhattacharya2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDonald Ford II vs PATRICK TIGHE0-6, 2-6
2026-06-02vs MHall (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCraig Menninger vs Matt Steckel6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesChuck Norton vs Owen Williams6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Men - Tues PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TZimmer (PPRSC)54151228238
2MPease/KChapman (Piper Glen)45131431245
3MHall (Raintree)45131433251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Trevor Zimmer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.00
Chuck Norton
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.95
Scott Zimmer
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.94
Craig Menninger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.91
Donald Ford II
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trevor Zimmer + Chuck Norton3258% games+5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trevor Zimmer
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Chuck Norton
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Scott Zimmer
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Craig Menninger
12W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Donald Ford II
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.