Teams

OC Costa Mesa TC - Sabrina

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 4.0W

24 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-11vs OC Irvine Great Park - Susie R -10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLiz Kirksey / Jamie Bland vs Jody Brennan / Lori Reimers5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Kirksey / Jamie Bland vs Michele Savoie / Sabrina MacLachlan3-6, 4-6
2025-03-28vs OC NBTC - NedraLost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Bland / Liz Kirksey vs Diane Heimstaedt / Carrie Jackson5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJennifer Czech / Liz Kirksey vs Trisha Bowen / Marianne Richards0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Welford / Sandra Schmid vs Elyzabeth Pham / Kelly Kehlet0-6, 0-6
2025-02-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesLiz Kirksey / Jane Tran vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLiz Kirksey / Maili Rood vs Holly Wyler / Yoko Bannai6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-17vs OC DHTC - Dara - 1030Won 10
W#1 DoublesLiz Kirksey / Laura Brooks vs Michelle Espeleta / Gabrielle Hansen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-10vs OC Lifetime RSC - KellyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiz Kirksey / Janis Thomas vs Kelly Stacy / Michelle Frohlich7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Laura Brooks
published
3.80
Aimee Boyles
published 4
Brooke Willems
published 4
3.69
Jamie Bland
published
3.68
Maria Solomon
published
3.68
Jane Tran
published
3.67
Maili Rood
published
3.62
Susie Kim
published
3.61
Brittany Nevins
published 4
3.54
Sandra Schmid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Laura Edles
published 4
3.49
Jennifer Czech
published
3.47
Liz Kirksey
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.44
Karen Obst
published
3.36
Kim Kurisu
published
3.31
Laura O'Leary
published
3.18
Joy Davis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Raquel Schell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jamie Straszewski
published
Janis Thomas
published
Jill Chomer
published
Kim Schattinger
published
Linda Marcopulos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sabrina Newton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Tran + Jennifer Czech1549% games−0.2% vs expected
Maria Solomon + Maili Rood4262% games−1.2% vs expected
Jamie Bland + Jennifer Czech4163% gamesnot enough data
Laura Brooks + Aimee Boyles3257% gamesnot enough data
Liz Kirksey + Laura O'Leary303 matchesnot enough data
Joy Davis + Sabrina Newton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Brooks
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Aimee Boyles
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Brooke Willems
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Bland
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Maria Solomon
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Jane Tran
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Maili Rood
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Susie Kim
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
4
Brittany Nevins
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
Sandra Schmid
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Laura Edles
18W–18L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Jennifer Czech
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Liz Kirksey
111W–98L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Karen Obst
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Kim Kurisu
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
Laura O'Leary
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Joy Davis
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Raquel Schell
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Jamie Straszewski
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janis Thomas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Chomer
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Schattinger
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Marcopulos
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sabrina Newton
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.