Teams

CDTA W 40&OM3.5 5.Forest View Rustagi Sun 4 $23

CDTA Winter 40 & Over W · E

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesManoranjan Mohanty / Eric Yeh vs Charles Schafer / Keith Boutell2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSourav Sen vs Louie Gonzalez6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMandar Bankhele / Grant Wu vs RICO de LARA / Leo Kanev6-7, 1-4
L#1 DoublesVijaykumar Patel / Mandar Bankhele vs William Irwin / Mark Garcia3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesManoranjan Mohanty / Eric Yeh vs Mark Spinazze / Mariusz Cislak2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSourav Sen / Vinod Saravana vs Andy Gould / Tarun Chawla2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesHiren Patel / Bhalchandra Vartak vs Chen Cheng / Billy Lin5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDhiraj Rustagi vs Tarun Chawla6-7, 6-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNagarajan Gopalsamy / Rajesh Garlapati vs William Irwin / Mark Garcia1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichael Wellems / Vinod Saravana vs Kedar Bhat / Brian Atad3-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesVijaykumar Patel vs Saurabh Kumar6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNagarajan Gopalsamy / Rajesh Garlapati vs Barry Dauber / Takaki Mimura2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSourav Sen / Dhiraj Rustagi vs David MacK / Michael Roth6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBhalchandra Vartak / Rajesh Garlapati vs Alex Paz / Matt Newman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSourav Sen / Grant Wu vs Robert Cal / Geoffrey Miller0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRoland Liccioni / Michael Wellems vs Rick Spurgeon / Brad Schulman2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesSteven Dayon / Rajesh Garlapati vs Kyle Karwande / Michael Dimuzio6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesVijaykumar Patel vs Marc Pelini6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMandar Bankhele / Bhalchandra Vartak vs Richard Rykhus / Michael Eighan7-6, 5-3
L#3 DoublesDhiraj Rustagi / Andrew Rubanovich vs Richard Morton / Joe Morton1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSrinivas Challuri / Bhalchandra Vartak vs Alex Paz / Robert Cal6-3, 5-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNagarajan Gopalsamy vs Paul Leyderman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVijaykumar Patel / Sourav Sen vs Geoffrey Miller / Rick Spurgeon7-5, 2-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHiren Patel / Mandar Bankhele vs Srdan Kostic / Tom Levy6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesHiren Patel / Steven Dayon vs Charles Schafer / William James6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesVijaykumar Patel vs Joel Brown6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSrinivas Challuri / Manoranjan Mohanty vs Muhammad Akbar / Leo Kanev4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesAndrey Petrov / Srinivas Challuri vs Jon Geise / Karn Sri3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesVijaykumar Patel vs Chris Trifilio6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNagarajan Gopalsamy / Roland Liccioni vs John Clancy / Hunter Wiggins7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAndrey Petrov / Rajesh Garlapati vs Joe Morton / Mike Lyman6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesVijaykumar Patel / Michael Wellems vs Jose Gonzalez / Richard Rykhus6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSteven Dayon / Vinod Saravana vs Michael Eighan / Marc Pelini6-4, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 40&OM3.5 2.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $2282271336344
2CDTA W 40&OM3.5 1.MT Bann Spurgeon Sun 2 $2764251539337
3CDTA W 40&OM3.5 3.Tam Kanev Sun 5 $2264221839303
4CDTA W 40&OM3.5 5.Forest View Rustagi Sun 4 $2355182249382
5CDTA W 40&OM3.5 6.Naperville Esancy Sat 4 $2446211945345
6CDTA W 40&OM3.5 4.Tam Robbie Sat 3 $221973368441

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Rajesh Garlapati
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Andrey Petrov
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Bhalchandra Vartak
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Michael Wellems
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Eric Yeh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Sourav Sen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.33
Nagarajan Gopalsamy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.28
Steven Dayon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Grant Wu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Vijaykumar Patel
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.27
Roland Liccioni
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Arvind Ramesh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Manoranjan Mohanty
published 3.5
3.18
Krishnakumar Ganesh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Dhiraj Rustagi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Srinivas Challuri
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Mandar Bankhele
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Vinod Saravana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Hiren Patel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrey Petrov + Rajesh Garlapati10071% games+12.3% vs expected
Roland Liccioni + Steven Dayon4259% games+9.9% vs expected
Dhiraj Rustagi + Andrew Rubanovich4745% games−2.4% vs expected
Dhiraj Rustagi + Manoranjan Mohanty5848% games−4.1% vs expected
Arvind Ramesh + Krishnakumar Ganesh101446% games−10.1% vs expected
Srinivas Challuri + Bhalchandra Vartak5458% gamesnot enough data
Dhiraj Rustagi + Mandar Bankhele3251% gamesnot enough data
Dhiraj Rustagi + Sourav Sen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rajesh Garlapati
38W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
4
Andrey Petrov
43W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Bhalchandra Vartak
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Michael Wellems
35W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Eric Yeh
29W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Sourav Sen
31W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Nagarajan Gopalsamy
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Steven Dayon
73W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Grant Wu
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Vijaykumar Patel
32W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
Roland Liccioni
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Arvind Ramesh
11W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Manoranjan Mohanty
43W–37L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Krishnakumar Ganesh
20W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Dhiraj Rustagi
89W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Srinivas Challuri
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Mandar Bankhele
8W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Vinod Saravana
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Andrew Rubanovich
72W–105L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Hiren Patel
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.