Teams

SGC - Ergul

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Men) - Fall

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-30vs SYC - SmithSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJake Grier vs John Austin0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMehmet Ergul / Thomas Farrell vs William Rhangos / Charles Harris6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2025-09-25vs SATA/Edward KowalewskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesMehmet Ergul / Ron Osterloh vs Tim Burger / Daniel Burdick1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJake Grier vs Corey McKever3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesThomas Farrell vs Chau Truong2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Men) - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Paul Balducci
published
3.45
Taylor Ellison
published
3.35
Mehmet Ergul
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.32
Chris Godfrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Jacob Massee
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Ron Osterloh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Thomas Farrell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Rich Greco
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.24
Scott Rasplicka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Jake Grier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Paul Badowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.84
George Miller
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Miller Glover
published
Rob Cordasco
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ron Osterloh + Taylor Ellison10165% games+13.1% vs expected
Paul Badowski + Mehmet Ergul2544% games−0.8% vs expected
Mehmet Ergul + Scott Rasplicka4547% games−1.1% vs expected
Rob Cordasco + Paul Badowski2539% games−6.8% vs expected
Paul Badowski + Thomas Farrell044 matchesnot enough data
Paul Badowski + George Miller134 matchesnot enough data
Paul Balducci + Mehmet Ergul224 matchesnot enough data
Mehmet Ergul + George Miller224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Balducci
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Taylor Ellison
10W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Mehmet Ergul
24W–31L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Chris Godfrey
23W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Jacob Massee
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Ron Osterloh
16W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
Thomas Farrell
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Rich Greco
13W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Scott Rasplicka
11W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Jake Grier
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Paul Badowski
11W–33L career · 8 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
George Miller
4W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
Miller Glover
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rob Cordasco
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.