Teams

ALMADEN VAC CM6.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-20vs VILLAGES GCC CM6.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesDean Bell / Raja Jacob vs Paul Spisar / Josh Liao0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEugene Bonev / Eyal Baruch vs Steve Olson / Lisi Bettencourt2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesErik Ordentlich / Boris Litinsky vs Michael Tuft / Don Clarke5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Suneel Sharma
published
3.25
Muneer Waheed
published
3.22
Gil Suh
published 3.5
3.13
Jeffrey Essner
published
3.11
Bijan Rafizadeh
published 3.5
3.11
Erik Ordentlich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Eugene Bonev
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Eyal Baruch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Raoul Badaoui
published
2.75
Dean Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Boris Litinsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Dominic Delgado
published 3
2.57
Jack Lin
published 3
2.42
Raja Jacob
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Lauriola
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eyal Baruch + Jeffrey Essner7162% games+9.0% vs expected
Raoul Badaoui + Dean Bell4164% gamesnot enough data
Erik Ordentlich + Raoul Badaoui033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suneel Sharma
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
Muneer Waheed
5W–22L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Gil Suh
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.22
Jeffrey Essner
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Bijan Rafizadeh
3W–14L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Erik Ordentlich
4W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Eugene Bonev
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Eyal Baruch
17W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83
Raoul Badaoui
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Dean Bell
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Boris Litinsky
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Dominic Delgado
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
Jack Lin
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.57
Raja Jacob
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.42
Michael Lauriola
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.