Teams

Doris/Madison

2022 COTA USTA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women - Spring · Womens Day 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.39 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Womens Day 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Thompson
published 3.5
3.15
Angela Davis
published 3.5
3.11
Donna Conner
published 3.5
3.10
Elisa Frey-Jackson
published 3.5
3.08
Anne Trulock
published 3.5
3.04
Pam Arienzo
published
3.01
Brook Peppers
published 3.5
2.97
Andi Thomas
published 3.5
Connie Vill
published 3
2.40
Doris Johnson
published 3
Jean Mundy
published
Kimberly Lancaster
published
Robin Harrison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Arienzo + Elisa Frey-Jackson3349% games−8.1% vs expected
Andi Thomas + Elisa Frey-Jackson3251% gamesnot enough data
Robin Harrison + Pam Arienzo044 matchesnot enough data
Connie Vill + Donna Conner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Thompson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Angela Davis
17W–23L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Donna Conner
14W–23L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Elisa Frey-Jackson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Anne Trulock
14W–27L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Pam Arienzo
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Brook Peppers
15W–29L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Andi Thomas
9W–23L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Connie Vill
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Doris Johnson
9W–26L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.40
Jean Mundy
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Lancaster
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Harrison
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.