Teams

Kau Belles Tri-Level

2021 Montgomery Tri-Level Fall · Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-12-14vs Cosmic Strings TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Wendy Carey vs Michelyn Boyd / June Chung6-3, 7-6
2021-12-09vs Cosmic Strings TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristen Harsha / Pamela Dean vs Michelyn Boyd / Shalen Fairbanks6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBrenda Kaechele / Maria Angelica Camp vs Shirin Ahmed / Karen Schuler3-6, 5-6
2021-11-20vs Cosmic Strings TriWon 20
W#1 DoublesWendy Carey / Mary Papadopulos vs Laura McInerney / Susan Homberg6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRegina Farrington / Elizabeth Hok vs Shirin Ahmed / Alina Luca2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-11-10vs Cosmic Strings TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Wendy Carey vs Polyxena Speros / Shalen Fairbanks6-3, 6-1
2021-11-07vs Cosmic Strings TriWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Lee / Mary Papadopulos vs June Chung / Susan Homberg6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Chan / Nicole Ifill vs Grace Becton / Gloria McDowell4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesZoie Acadia / Maria Angelica Camp vs Shirin Ahmed / Donna Hemans6-1, 6-4
2021-10-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesRegina Farrington / Elizabeth Hok vs Cynthia Rapp / Donna Hemans6-3, 6-4
2021-10-19vs Cosmic Strings TriWon 20
W#1 DoublesWendy Carey / Mary Papadopulos vs Michelyn Boyd / Shalen Fairbanks6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda Kaechele / Maria Angelica Camp vs Alina Luca / Donna Hemans6-4, 7-6
2021-10-13vs Cosmic Strings TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Dean / Christen Harsha vs June Chung / Michelyn Boyd6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Angelica Camp / Zoie Acadia vs Alina Luca / Donna Hemans4-6, 6-7
2021-10-04vs Cosmic Strings TriLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristen Harsha / Mary Papadopulos vs Laura McInerney / Polyxena Speros6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Coe / Nicole Ifill vs Grace Becton / Alison Serino2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRegina Farrington / Elizabeth Hok vs Alina Luca / Ruxandra Badiu2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Christen Harsha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.12
Pamela Dean
published
3.90
Evelyn Chan
published 4
3.69
Mary Papadopulos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Zoie Acadia
published 4
3.53
Nicole Ifill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Regina Farrington
published 3.5
3.27
Nicola Goren
published
Brenda Kaechele
published 3.5
Frances Brennan
published 3.5
3.23
Elizabeth Hok
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Maria Angelica Camp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Jonaki Bose
published
2.77
Rona Birnbaum
published
Jessica Lee
published
Wendy Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Farrington + Zoie Acadia2546% gamesnot enough data
Regina Farrington + Elizabeth Hok123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Christen Harsha
482W–135L career · 3 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
4.58
Pamela Dean
40W–40L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Evelyn Chan
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Mary Papadopulos
178W–103L career · 6 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Zoie Acadia
359W–171L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Nicole Ifill
253W–215L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Regina Farrington
179W–186L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Nicola Goren
14W–11L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Brenda Kaechele
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Frances Brennan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Hok
124W–134L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Maria Angelica Camp
144W–113L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
2.96
Jonaki Bose
12W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
Rona Birnbaum
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Jessica Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Carey
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.