Teams

Sarasota/Esposito/18&Over4.0W

2025 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over Spring Weekend · 4.0 W Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 4.06 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-28vs River Strand BreidensteinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSandy Severs / Victoria Sanchez vs Nancy Finman / Kim Reiser2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Susanne Booth6-1, 6-3
2025-06-21vs Payne Park SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarbara Cogen / Sandy Severs vs Courtney Rosenthal / Tambra Ford4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNia Esposito / Diana Stadelnikas vs Marsha Timm / Jennifer Butcher3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Spiegel / Kathy Rain vs Roberta Smith / Nicole Thompson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-07vs River Strand BreidensteinWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Karen Nicholson vs Annmarie Curle / Kim Reiser3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Susanne Booth6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNia Esposito / Carol Frazier vs Nancy Finman / Kara Beene6-2, 7-5
2025-05-31vs Payne Park SmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Donna Dubinsky vs Courtney Rosenthal / Jennifer Stroble3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Barbara Cogen vs Roberta Smith / Nicole Thompson4-6, 6-7
2025-05-10vs River Strand BreidensteinWon 40
W#1 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Barbara Cogen vs Lenore Funes / Kim Reiser6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Annmarie Curle6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain vs Nancy Finman / Kara Beene6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Handel / Sandy Severs vs Penny Franklin / Emily Franklin5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-03vs Payne Park SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Christine Handel vs Courtney Rosenthal / Sheila Engert6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBarbara Cogen / Sandy Severs vs Roberta Smith / Sara Johnson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVictoria Sanchez / Sandra Barkey vs Nicole Thompson / Marsha Timm2-6, 2-6
2025-04-19vs River Strand BreidensteinWon 20
W#2 DoublesNia Esposito / Carol Frazier vs Emily Franklin / Annmarie Curle7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Tschetter / Victoria Sanchez vs Hattie Grimsley / Jenny Sherr2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-12vs Payne Park SmithSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNia Esposito / Christine Handel vs Marsha Timm / Courtney Rosenthal4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Karen Nicholson vs Sara Johnson / Suzy Feinberg6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Carol Frazier
published 4.5
3.99
Christine Handel
published 4
3.90
Nia Esposito
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Svetlana Janglin
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Kathy Rain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Karen Spiegel
published
3.70
Diana Stadelnikas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Karen Nicholson
published
3.70
Donna Dubinsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Betty Jo Zeigler
published 4
3.64
Karen Collins
published
3.61
Barbara Cogen
published 4
3.44
Lisa Tschetter
published
Sandy Severs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Victoria Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Stadelnikas + Nia Esposito18955% games+5.4% vs expected
Nia Esposito + Christine Handel6163% games+4.5% vs expected
Donna Dubinsky + Kathy Rain232650% games+1.6% vs expected
Svetlana Janglin + Nia Esposito9457% games−0.2% vs expected
Diana Stadelnikas + Sandy Severs3447% games−3.2% vs expected
Sandy Severs + Nia Esposito5159% gamesnot enough data
Svetlana Janglin + Kathy Rain5065% gamesnot enough data
Karen Nicholson + Carol Frazier404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Frazier
18W–1L career · type D · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.51
4
Christine Handel
26W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Nia Esposito
154W–82L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.90
4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Kathy Rain
91W–94L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Karen Spiegel
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Diana Stadelnikas
106W–106L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Donna Dubinsky
62W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Betty Jo Zeigler
9W–22L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Karen Collins
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Barbara Cogen
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lisa Tschetter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Sandy Severs
83W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Sanchez
7W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.