Teams

LA LLW MountainGate 55+ 8.0M - Ray Sahranavard

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over – LA · LA - Men 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-16vs LA - Griffin Club 55+ 8.0 MenLost 12
W#1 DoublesBruce Hofert / Ray Sahranavard vs Jeffrey Kabot / Chris Mass6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmr Hassan / Michele Greco vs Mike Winn / Tom McFerson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRupen Cetinyan / Jamie Murphy vs Dereck Messana / Chris Abramson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-01vs LA - Griffin Club 55+ 8.0 MenWon 10
W#1 DoublesRay Sahranavard / Bruce Hofert vs Tom McFerson / Kevin Dill6-2, 6-3
2026-07-25vs LA - Griffin Club 55+ 8.0 MenWon 30
W#1 DoublesRandolph Magnin / Ray Sahranavard vs Jason Carr / Kevin Dill6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmr Hassan / Rupen Cetinyan vs Evan Berman / Mike Winn7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichael Chall / Jamie Murphy vs Darren Finestone / Dereck Messana4-1
2026-07-19vs LA - Griffin Club 55+ 8.0 MenLost 01
L#1 DoublesBruce Hofert / Steven Marenberg vs Jeffrey Kabot / Chris Mass6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · LA - Men 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA LLW MountainGate 55+ 8.0M - Ray Sahranavard3310819157
2LA - Griffin Club 55+ 8.0 Men3381024170

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Ray Sahranavard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Jamie Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Bruce Hofert
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
Amr Hassan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Glenn Kopelson
published 4
3.37
Steven Marenberg
published
Michael Chall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michele Greco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Randolph Magnin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rupen Cetinyan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Hofert + Amr Hassan2352% gamesnot enough data
Randolph Magnin + Ray Sahranavard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ray Sahranavard
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Jamie Murphy
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Bruce Hofert
58W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Amr Hassan
3W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Glenn Kopelson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.53
Steven Marenberg
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Michael Chall
5W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele Greco
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Randolph Magnin
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rupen Cetinyan
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.