Teams

LCTA55/Ivonowski/AE

2022 USTA 55 & Over Spring · Women-3.5 - Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-11-02vs LCTA55/Harper/IOn ClubSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSherry Lilley / Judy Hartzog vs Cathleen Mooney / Carol Welsman6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMelanie Ivonowski / Robyn Rowe vs Lisa Kuisel / Tracy Cassaday4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women-3.5 - Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Faye MacKall
published 3.5
3.41
Laura Christiansen
published
3.34
Landa Tucker
published
3.29
Judy Hartzog
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Melanie Ivonowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Rhonda Moore
published
3.05
Laura Doerr
published
2.95
Lynn Meador
published
Jean Lutz
published
Joanne Nelson
published
Nancy Meier
published
Nancy Sousa
published
Susan Mock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Meador + Judy Hartzog4255% games+0.3% vs expected
Melanie Ivonowski + Lynn Meador101544% games−5.9% vs expected
Faye MacKall + Joanne Nelson5160% gamesnot enough data
Landa Tucker + Melanie Ivonowski3254% gamesnot enough data
Laura Doerr + Joanne Nelson4154% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Ivonowski + Judy Hartzog4161% gamesnot enough data
Landa Tucker + Judy Hartzog224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Doerr + Laura Christiansen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Faye MacKall
108W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.50
Laura Christiansen
57W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Landa Tucker
36W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Judy Hartzog
64W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Melanie Ivonowski
39W–74L career · 1 line in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Rhonda Moore
10W–20L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
Laura Doerr
43W–29L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
Lynn Meador
43W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Jean Lutz
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joanne Nelson
86W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Meier
7W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Sousa
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Mock
31W–42L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.