Teams

PDavis-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

11 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-25vs CKing-SVCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPatsy Park / Caroline Sloan vs Sarah Tuttle / Kelsey Phillips6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarin von Kahr / Virginia Wang vs Cheryl Molinatto / Elizabeth Misiti4-6, 6-7
2025-04-23vs MPruette-CCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLindsey McIver / Susanne Schmal vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Megan Pruette6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLucy McMillan / Patsy Park vs Lauren Long / Emily Bulkley6-2, 6-3
2025-04-04vs JStewart-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesPamela Howell-Davis / Kellie Johnson vs Emani Eaglin / Mary Corcoran6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarin von Kahr / Megan McCullough vs Donnetta Hanson / Sandy Rogowski6-3, 6-1
2025-03-28vs CFong-ENOWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatsy Park / Susanne Schmal vs Marjory Moreau / Sybil Pye6-1, 6-3
2025-03-21vs APerry-HVCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Laird / Lindsey McIver vs Anna Jessup / Katie Mavrogordato6-2, 6-1
2025-03-14vs CKing-SVCWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Sarah Tuttle6-3, 6-0
2025-03-07vs EPatulski-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Howell-Davis / Patsy Park vs Onyi Dillibe / Johannah Maynor6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusanne Schmal / Ashley Hinton vs Jill Hathorn / Elizabeth Haderer4-6, 3-6
2025-02-28vs MLong-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVirginia Wang / Carin von Kahr vs Junga Han / Xian Zhang6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLindsey McIver vs Lizzy Burch3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Caroline Sloan
published 3
2.88
Megan McCullough
published
2.84
Patsy Park
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Lindsey McIver
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.76
Lucy McMillan
published
2.71
Carin von Kahr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Kellie Johnson
published
2.54
Pamela Howell-Davis
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
Susanne Schmal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Amanda Laird
published 2.5
2.27
Virginia Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Howell-Davis + Carin von Kahr4157% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Howell-Davis + Patsy Park3256% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Laird + Megan McCullough123 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Howell-Davis + Lucy McMillan033 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Sloan + Patsy Park213 matchesnot enough data
Carin von Kahr + Susanne Schmal303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Sloan
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
Megan McCullough
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.88
3
Patsy Park
42W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Lindsey McIver
44W–36L career · type A · 9 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lucy McMillan
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Carin von Kahr
43W–63L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Kellie Johnson
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%16%84%
2.64
3
Pamela Howell-Davis
119W–146L career · 7 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Susanne Schmal
60W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.53
2.5
Amanda Laird
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Virginia Wang
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.