Teams

Avalon Luchsinger

2022 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-26vs Wyndham Warriors HouffLost 01
L#3 DoublesNicholas Grainger / Kristopher Johnson vs Jay Harter / STEVEN ROBERTS6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-05vs Westwood GereckeWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicholas Grainger / Rob Henley vs Wes Valentine / Robert Teele1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-28vs Avalon Ghita MenWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristopher Johnson / Nicholas Grainger vs Steven Edlavitch / Chris Giacchi6-2, 6-2
2022-09-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesNicholas Grainger / Rob Henley vs Jack Skoog / Taylor Barmak6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gary Wills
published 4
3.65
Carey Donovan
published 4
3.62
Nicholas Grainger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Karl Jones
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Todd Mungo
published
3.22
Matthew Luchsinger
published
3.19
Tim Dolan
published
3.06
Glenn Mizrach
published 3
3.02
Kristopher Johnson
published
2.88
Rob Henley
published
David Harbach
published 3
2.62
Chris Haberlin
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Mizrach + Kristopher Johnson123 matchesnot enough data
Todd Mungo + Matthew Luchsinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gary Wills
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Carey Donovan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Nicholas Grainger
109W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.62
3.5
Karl Jones
144W–148L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Todd Mungo
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Matthew Luchsinger
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Tim Dolan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Glenn Mizrach
13W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
Kristopher Johnson
17W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
Rob Henley
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
David Harbach
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Chris Haberlin
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.