Teams

Courts at Cape Coral - Riccio

2026 LeeCharlotte Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Women Thursday Eve

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-12vs Gateway - BlackmonWon 40
W#1 DoublesSue Savage / Cynthia Trykall vs Pamela Baumgart / Alisha Daines6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCheryl VandeVoorde vs Linda Blackmon6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Humann / Robin Riccio vs Peggy Inniss / Cassia Marshall6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Cronin / Cathrin Matzen vs Toni Peterson / Molly Hawkins6-4, 7-6
2026-03-09vs Paseo - ZimmerWon 31
L#1 DoublesSue Savage / Michelle Cronin vs Leesa Cotton / Leticia Garcia5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesCheryl VandeVoorde vs Amanda Patten4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Humann / Val Pacenta vs Marilyn Kole / Rhonda Allen6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRobin Riccio / Kim McNeely vs Donna Douglass / Colleen Benson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-26vs Babcock National - McDonaldWon 31
W#1 DoublesSue Savage / Cynthia Trykall vs Karen Nuthals / Anne Mcdonald6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesHeather Humann vs Lori Bieniek3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Riccio / Cathrin Matzen vs Diana Barajas / Pam Keyes6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Cronin / Kim McNeely vs Lana Wilson / Soozie Baker6-0, 6-3
2026-02-22vs UTC - GonzalezWon 31
W#1 DoublesCathrin Matzen / Sue Savage vs Regina Lookis / Beryl Gonzalez6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHeather Humann vs Lucia Parvan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim McNeely / Michelle Cronin vs Debbie Hele / Susan Jacoby4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBeth Andrews / Val Pacenta vs Melissa Bunce / Bettina Rubio6-0, 6-0
2026-02-19vs LEECHAR/AttusoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSue Savage / Cynthia Trykall vs Hilary Cole / Sally Loessner0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCheryl VandeVoorde vs Dorothy Waldron6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Humann / Cathrin Matzen vs Melissa Dorr / J Q Hall6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVal Pacenta / Beth Andrews vs Wendy Olek / Teresa Ganley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-01-29vs Legends - DelgrecoWon 31
W#1 DoublesRobin Riccio / Cheryl VandeVoorde vs Barbara Campbell / Donna Lee6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHeather Humann vs Joanna Godden4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSue Savage / Kim McNeely vs Peggy Martin / Jeanne Meeks6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCathrin Matzen / Val Pacenta vs Mary Heasley / Barbara Nuzzi6-2, 6-1
2026-01-22vs FMRC - BoydSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSue Savage / Cynthia Trykall vs Victoria Boyd / Dawn Mannina-Sanford3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHeather Humann vs Tammy Mueller6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCathrin Matzen / Robin Riccio vs Renee Chodkowski / Joanne Reilly6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cronin / Kim McNeely vs Kathy Blackburn / Nancy Sanders0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-01-15vs Cypress Lake - ManiboSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Cronin / Kim McNeely vs Tanya Sheffield / Sara Manibo4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Humann vs Kim Regets4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCathrin Matzen / Val Pacenta vs Christine Wiles / Mary Witham6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobin Riccio / Sue Savage vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Thursday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Val Pacenta
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.43
Cheryl VandeVoorde
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Robin Riccio
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.36
Cynthia Trykall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Cathrin Matzen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.35
Heather Humann
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.27
Sue Savage
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.21
Kim McNeely
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Michelle Cronin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Beth Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Humann + Val Pacenta17367% games+12.5% vs expected
Kim McNeely + Michelle Cronin3647% games+1.3% vs expected
Sue Savage + Cathrin Matzen3251% gamesnot enough data
Sue Savage + Val Pacenta4167% gamesnot enough data
Robin Riccio + Val Pacenta4163% gamesnot enough data
Cathrin Matzen + Val Pacenta4160% gamesnot enough data
Sue Savage + Cynthia Trykall224 matchesnot enough data
Kim McNeely + Cathrin Matzen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Val Pacenta
53W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Cheryl VandeVoorde
67W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Robin Riccio
32W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Cynthia Trykall
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Cathrin Matzen
24W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Heather Humann
50W–32L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Sue Savage
40W–28L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Kim McNeely
6W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Michelle Cronin
6W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Beth Andrews
29W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.