Teams

Twin Hickory Yu

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-23vs CCV WilliamsLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Windy Campbell6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-16vs Kings Charter RamserLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Morgan / Deirdre Vaughan vs Donna Mourtzakis / Victoria Galiffa4-6, 1-6
2021-06-14vs Bon Air BalsamoWon 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Karin Sheets6-2, 6-2
2021-06-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Morgan / Deirdre Vaughan vs Amy Grattan / Brenda Morris6-1, 6-3
2021-06-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Michelle Harman6-3, 6-4
2021-05-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Colleen Quinn3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Rebecca Morgan
published
3.31
Lisa Frazier
published
3.28
Deirdre Vaughan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Corinne Skevington
published 3.5
3.17
Michelle Yu
published
3.17
Megan Lloyd
published
3.11
Jennifer Schwarz
published
2.88
Amy Buckberg
published 3
2.61
Suzanne Pericle
published
2.55
Stephanie Maurer
published
Lisa Taylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corinne Skevington + Jennifer Schwarz134 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Vaughan + Jennifer Schwarz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Morgan
15W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Lisa Frazier
18W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Deirdre Vaughan
162W–178L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Corinne Skevington
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Michelle Yu
12W–9L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Megan Lloyd
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
Jennifer Schwarz
8W–15L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Amy Buckberg
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
Suzanne Pericle
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
2.61
Stephanie Maurer
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
2.55
Lisa Taylor
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.