Teams

Rodrigue/40/DII/TWD/MCC

2025 NO Tri Level 40 & Over - Women Day · 4.0,3.5,3.0 NO (40&O) Women Day

22 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 NO (40&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Robyn Schwarz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Laurie Gaudet
published
3.66
Sharon Rivas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Kathy Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Peggy Whitener
published
3.52
Kaitlin Kelly
published
3.42
Malia Lebon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Pam Weiser
published
3.26
Crystal Bonura
published 3.5
3.20
Diane Rabin
published 3.5
3.19
Ashley Eaton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Lisa Yarborough
published
3.15
Ashley Gootee
published 3
3.12
Jennifer Rabalais
published
3.10
Leslie Fawer
published
3.08
Lori Rodrigue
published
3.02
Kathleen Kazour
published
2.98
Kathryn Wild
published
2.95
Liz Nance
published
2.87
Cheryl Streiffer
published 3
2.68
Leslie Moore
published
2.64
Ann Jackson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Gootee + Ashley Eaton7078% games+17.1% vs expected
Laurie Gaudet + Sharon Rivas9253% games+2.5% vs expected
Laurie Gaudet + Kathy Harris3258% games+1.5% vs expected
Kathryn Wild + Kathleen Kazour9360% games+0.7% vs expected
Laurie Gaudet + Peggy Whitener2346% games−4.2% vs expected
Liz Nance + Cheryl Streiffer314 matchesnot enough data
Malia Lebon + Liz Nance123 matchesnot enough data
Lori Rodrigue + Kathleen Kazour213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robyn Schwarz
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
Laurie Gaudet
26W–19L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Sharon Rivas
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Kathy Harris
7W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
Peggy Whitener
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Kaitlin Kelly
35W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Malia Lebon
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Pam Weiser
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Crystal Bonura
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Diane Rabin
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Ashley Eaton
34W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Lisa Yarborough
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Ashley Gootee
26W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
Jennifer Rabalais
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Leslie Fawer
21W–22L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Lori Rodrigue
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Kathleen Kazour
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Kathryn Wild
28W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Liz Nance
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
3
Cheryl Streiffer
24W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Leslie Moore
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Ann Jackson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.