Teams

Hill-Over the Hill-Candy Cane Park

*2025 Adult 55 & Over 6.0-9.0 NoHo Women · 8.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesElizabeth von Bodungen / Tammy Rogers vs Jill Polhemus / Carol Steinke3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMelissa Hill / Darci Marsh vs Kelli Ross / Teresa Biehn5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlicia Eisner / Janice Ashley vs Carol Davis / Donna Salmonsen6-2, 7-6
W#1 DoublesElizabeth von Bodungen / Darci Marsh vs Meredith Williams / Jill Polhemus6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Greaves / Alicia Eisner vs Teresa Biehn / Kelli Ross2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Hill / Kenita Whiteside vs Carol Davis / Dawn Brubaker2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJanice Ashley / Alicia Eisner vs Lynette O'Neil / Julie Neverman3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDarci Marsh / Kenita Whiteside vs Hiroko Max / Natalie Bevan6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStephanie Greaves / Elizabeth von Bodungen vs Risa Cogliandro / Elizabeth Friend7-6, 6-0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Greaves / Elizabeth von Bodungen vs Karen Fahrmeier / Michelle Purdy6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDarci Marsh / Melissa Hill vs Elizabeth Friend / Lynette O'Neil6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanice Ashley / Alicia Eisner vs Natalie Bevan / Hiroko Max6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesCammy Crawford / Tammy Rogers vs Michelle Purdy / Risa Cogliandro0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMelissa Hill / Elizabeth von Bodungen vs Lynette O'Neil / Elizabeth Friend6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDarci Marsh / Kenita Whiteside vs Natalie Bevan / Karen Fahrmeier7-6, 6-2
L#1 DoublesStephanie Greaves / Elizabeth von Bodungen vs Donna Salmonsen / Carol Davis7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Hill / Darci Marsh vs Jill Polhemus / Meredith Williams2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesViktoria Mategrano / Tammy Rogers vs Carol Mazar / Carol Steinke3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Elizabeth von Bodungen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.76
Stephanie Greaves
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Darci Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.67
Alicia Eisner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Cammy Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Viktoria Mategrano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Tammy Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Janice Ashley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kenita Whiteside
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth von Bodungen + Darci Marsh3254% games−1.5% vs expected
Stephanie Greaves + Elizabeth von Bodungen314 matchesnot enough data
Janice Ashley + Alicia Eisner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth von Bodungen
54W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Stephanie Greaves
49W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Darci Marsh
13W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Alicia Eisner
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Cammy Crawford
22W–12L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Viktoria Mategrano
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
Tammy Rogers
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Janice Ashley
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kenita Whiteside
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.