Teams

LA - Shadow's Aces

2021 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesCarrie Gasper / HARUKA FUKUDOME vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-21vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesDidi Sowul / Ali Laventhol vs Myrna Castanon / Jennifer Campoy7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2021-10-31vs LA - Slice GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAli Laventhol / Andrea Tieng vs Tanya Zarnitsa / Julie Kalechstein6-2, 6-2
2021-10-23vs LA - LATCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarrie Gasper / Kathleen Foy-Asaro vs Kate Angelo / Dana Reinisch6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRachel Berk / Holly Metts vs Mylene Moreno / Vicki Carrington3-6, 0-6
2021-10-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Foy-Asaro / Didi Sowul vs Kyatana Coussey / Tara Shultz - (DQ)*0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDiane Quan / Ali Laventhol vs Liz Iacuzzi / Alexandra Pichugina1-6, 6-7
2021-09-26vs LA - Kiss My AceSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRachel Berk / Holly Metts vs Carrie Zerling / Jennifer Campoy3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAli Laventhol / Allison Langus vs Sylvia DSouza / Tina Yang3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-09-19vs LA - Downtown AcesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHolly Metts / Rachel Berk vs Claire Gibbs / Fariba Navid7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Quan / Kathleen Foy-Asaro vs Dyan Laughter / Hilary Laughter7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Michelle Crossman
published
3.30
Paula Marbach
published
3.27
Susan Warner
published
3.26
Diane Quan
published 3.5
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Ali Laventhol
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Carrie Gasper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Holly Metts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Allison Langus
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Gasper + Kathleen Foy-Asaro181552% games+7.9% vs expected
Susan Warner + Allison Langus2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Crossman
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Paula Marbach
18W–24L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Susan Warner
18W–21L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Diane Quan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Ali Laventhol
163W–119L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Carrie Gasper
189W–211L career · 2 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Holly Metts
10W–19L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Allison Langus
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.