Teams

Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz

2025 Hampton Roads Tri-Level · Hampton Roads Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.93 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-25vs Caskill - Tri AnythingLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelsey Sarcone / Rebecca Hoover vs Ashley Jessee / Stephanie Caskill3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-25vs KezmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Newton / Carrie Coleman vs Grace Doss / Tiffani Sherlock3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-22vs ClaxtonLost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Aston / Gaye Benson vs Nicole Legum / Claire Walters0-6, 5-7
2025-09-08vs DomanskiLost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Aston / Gaye Benson vs Betty Domanski / Kelly Long3-6, 3-6
2025-08-04vs ClaxtonLost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Aston / Gaye Benson vs Nicole Legum / Claire Walters3-6, 4-6
2025-07-28vs WillardLost 01
L#2 DoublesGaye Benson / Cindy Aston vs Veronica Cummings / Shawen Bartol2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-22vs Caskill - Tri AnythingWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelsey Sarcone / Rebecca Hoover vs Stephanie Caskill / Liz Martin7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Charo Aguilar
published 4.5
4.18
Courtney Violette
published 4.5
3.76
Elizabeth Hope
published
3.75
Gaye Benson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Cindy Aston
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 4
3.69
Vinita Folck
published
3.52
Cory Dunn
published 3.5
3.35
Rebecca Hoover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Erica Sartwell
published
3.29
Carrie Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Anne Tew
published 3.5
Molly Nissman
published
Stacy Hennessy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gaye Benson + Cindy Aston142048% games−5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charo Aguilar
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Courtney Violette
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
Elizabeth Hope
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Gaye Benson
21W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Cindy Aston
53W–61L career · 12 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Vinita Folck
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.69
3.5
Cory Dunn
19W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Rebecca Hoover
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Erica Sartwell
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Carrie Coleman
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anne Tew
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Molly Nissman
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Hennessy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.