Teams

Ambrose/Knoxville

2026 Combo 18 & Over- Knoxville · 7.5 Men Combo Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-18vs Schoenfeld/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Moon / Eric Fellers vs Terry Jones II / Doug Yoder2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatt Whitehead / Nat Scott vs Stephen Wills / Rob Lucas4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJawad Sheikh / Daniel Lyngh vs Allan Schoenfeld / Daniel Navid2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.5 Men Combo Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ambrose/Knoxville000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Trey Ambrose
published
3.48
Daniel Moon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Nat Scott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Matt Whitehead
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Elijah Abel
published
2.96
Daniel Lyngh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Zakir Shaikh
published
2.75
Wojciech Wiktor
published
2.74
Juan Manuel Urquiza
published
2.71
Jawad Sheikh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Matthew Huddleston
published
Wade Milam
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trey Ambrose
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.97
3.5
Daniel Moon
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.48
Nat Scott
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Matt Whitehead
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Elijah Abel
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Daniel Lyngh
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Zakir Shaikh
10W–18L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Wojciech Wiktor
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Juan Manuel Urquiza
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
Jawad Sheikh
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Matthew Huddleston
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Wade Milam
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.