Teams

Tuplano- TBC

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-23vs Craig/Lassow- Double Bagle 40+ W23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPer Ostlund / CRAIG STERN vs Peter Kimball / Brian Reidinger4-6, 1-6
2023-03-02vs Chase/Schoenecker 40+ W23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPer Ostlund / CRAIG STERN vs Phillip Chase / Mark Stahl1-6, 3-6
2023-02-02vs Fermstad- Top 40 W23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJulian Bannach / CRAIG STERN vs Sean Koo / Dan Schauer6-3, 6-4
2023-01-26vs Goodman- Swillers 40+ W23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulian Bannach / CRAIG STERN vs John Reichling / Andrei Sivanich4-6, 6-7
2023-01-19vs Duwearatchi/Ballentine 4.0 40+ W23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulian Bannach / CRAIG STERN vs Timothy Marshall / Paul Sariego2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Julian Bannach
published
3.79
Ramon Villanueva
published
3.75
Bhavin Trivedi
published 4
3.74
Paul Jackson
published
3.71
Daniel Crouser
published 4
3.66
CRAIG STERN
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Per Ostlund
published
3.53
SCOTT HOWARD
published
3.50
Andrei Kittelson
published 3.5
3.44
Wilfert Long
published
3.24
Jov Tuplano
published
3.22
Fazel Haris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramon Villanueva + Julian Bannach10951% games−1.5% vs expected
Bhavin Trivedi + Paul Jackson1446% games−4.5% vs expected
Bhavin Trivedi + Daniel Crouser303 matchesnot enough data
Per Ostlund + Paul Jackson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julian Bannach
33W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
Ramon Villanueva
38W–26L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Bhavin Trivedi
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
Paul Jackson
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Daniel Crouser
21W–28L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
CRAIG STERN
131W–164L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Per Ostlund
14W–42L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
SCOTT HOWARD
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Andrei Kittelson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Wilfert Long
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
Jov Tuplano
24W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Fazel Haris
20W–24L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.