Teams

C 5.5W NC Damrow

2024 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-23vs C 5.5W GR KozakWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Snyder / Jen Zeiger vs Val Belcher / Staci Schweikert4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDesiree' Dowd / Megan Peters vs Heather Alexander / Victoria DiGennaro-Velayo6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Zimmermann / Gina Discenza vs Teresa Kozak / Pam Miller6-1, 6-4
2024-11-16vs C 5.5W AS AdkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Snyder / Noelle Buso vs Bethany Nussbaum / Sanda Howard2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Damrow / Gina Discenza vs Jennifer Stein / Kate Adkins6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLora Harley / Megan Pellegrino vs Sally Huttinger / Lee Mogus6-4, 6-3
2024-11-09vs C 5.5W HF BickelLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Damrow / Brittany Duggan vs Courtney Bickel / Melanie Conner6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Zimmermann / Megan Pellegrino vs Ann Hinton / Lisa Mears4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGinny Spring / Angie Adams vs Chassity Pence / Tammy Iams4-6, 3-6
2024-10-26vs C 5.5W BR TimkenWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Zimmermann / Noelle Buso vs Sara Timken / Jane Timken4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDesiree' Dowd / Megan Peters vs Traci Tsai / Elizabeth Milavickas4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Damrow / Brittany Duggan vs Amy Smith / Dena Morrison6-2, 6-2
2024-10-18vs C 5.5W GR KozakWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Snyder / Angie Adams vs Heidi MacLane-Hodges / Carol Jackson6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Zimmermann / Noelle Buso vs Ann Lindeman / Pamela Kelley6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGinny Spring / Gina Discenza vs Teresa Kozak / Pam Miller6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2024-10-13vs C 5.5W AS AdkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesLora Harley / Megan Pellegrino vs Bethany Nussbaum / Sanda Howard0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Snyder / Angie Adams vs Elizabeth Modricker / Kate Adkins6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Damrow / Gina Discenza vs Melinda Thomas / Kimberly Seaman6-3, 6-2
2024-10-05vs C 5.5W HF BickelLost 12
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Snyder / Jen Zeiger vs Tammy Iams / Karen Wooten6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Damrow / Megan Peters vs Courtney Bickel / Melanie Conner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGinny Spring / Noelle Buso vs Ann Hinton / Lisa Mears1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-22vs C 5.5W BR TimkenWon 21
W#1 DoublesJen Zeiger / Karen Zimmermann vs Traci Tsai / Dena Morrison6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Damrow / Megan Peters vs Kimberly Klapchar / Elizabeth Milavickas3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJo Ann Cecchini / Noelle Buso vs Annette McCann / Jane Timken6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Brittany Duggan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.13
Jacqueline Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.97
Amy Damrow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Lora Harley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Desiree' Dowd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Noelle Buso
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Angie Adams
published 3
2.63
Jen Zeiger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.61
Megan Pellegrino
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Megan Peters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Jo Ann Cecchini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Gina Discenza
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ginny Spring
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Zimmermann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Desiree' Dowd + Lora Harley4152% gamesnot enough data
Jo Ann Cecchini + Noelle Buso314 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Snyder + Amy Damrow314 matchesnot enough data
Desiree' Dowd + Noelle Buso303 matchesnot enough data
Lora Harley + Noelle Buso123 matchesnot enough data
Lora Harley + Amy Damrow213 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Snyder + Jen Zeiger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brittany Duggan
19W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.13
Jacqueline Snyder
76W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Amy Damrow
39W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Lora Harley
44W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Desiree' Dowd
56W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Noelle Buso
45W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Angie Adams
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jen Zeiger
45W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
2.63
Megan Pellegrino
14W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
2.61
Megan Peters
23W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
Jo Ann Cecchini
37W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Gina Discenza
24W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Ginny Spring
14W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Zimmermann
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.