Teams

Doctor Johnson

2025 18 & over Summer Flex Singles · 2.5 Men

1 player · average NTRP / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-27vs INFJLost 01
L#1 SinglesJonathan Mccall vs Teng Yang0-6, 2-6
2025-07-23vs Regis de AndradeWon 10
W#1 SinglesJonathan Mccall vs Regis de Andrade7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 2.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hao6161342
2John Landis5050234
3Lucas5151238
4Serving toast4141436
5Slice, Slice, Baby4343864
6Szueber Summer4343962
72.5 tamarsh3131229
8Wicked2323646
9INFJ2424855
10Carlos R101003
11Kellogg1111218
12Doctor Johnson1111218
13Scott Fish1313639
14Duong1414961
15Troy KonigWilcox15151068
16Imran000000
17ShawnSolo000000
18Hilden0202424
19Regis de Andrade05051061
20Andrew Smith06061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jonathan Mccall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Mccall
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.