Teams

CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesSusan Sheridan / Joyce Westerdahl vs Hilary Quinn / Rachel Clark3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Andrea Primer vs Suzanne Young / Christina Bear5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoyce Westerdahl / Susan Sheridan vs Lori Tanking / Audrey Wu1-6, 2-6
2024-02-28vs CV-Indian Wells TG/BarnesLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Susan Sheridan vs Jennifer Ruddell / Alethea Platis1-6, 4-6
2024-02-24vs CV-Indian Wells TG/BarnesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Susan Sheridan vs Janneche Nevin / Barbara Maher3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-02-10vs CV-Shadow Mountain/DentonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoyce Westerdahl / Shelley Lynch vs Kim Hamlik / Caroline Cavelti2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Denise Roethenmund vs Jennifer Charron / Heidi Kelly3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-01-06vs CV-Shadow Mountain/DentonLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Jennifer Morton vs Lori Gill / Stephania Denton6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Katie Scullion
published
3.45
Andrea Primer
published 3.5
3.30
Denise Roethenmund
published 3.5
3.30
Maria Himelman
published
3.15
Jill Goldman
published
3.14
Shelley Lynch
published
3.07
Jackie Akman
published 3.5
2.99
Linda Moskowitz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.95
Arlene Grodnick
published 3
Joyce Westerdahl
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Scullion + Shelley Lynch3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Scullion
20W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Andrea Primer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Denise Roethenmund
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Maria Himelman
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Jill Goldman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Shelley Lynch
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jackie Akman
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Linda Moskowitz
39W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Arlene Grodnick
5W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
Joyce Westerdahl
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.