Teams

ACP.Jee

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-10vs ANP.ChambersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Pedraza / Vivian Neto vs RANEE KUMAR / Michelle Fleer6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori Jee / Paula Laine vs Judith Hagopian-Edwards / Matalaba Napier6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWendy Younkin / Yuna Kim vs Monica Venkateswaran / Katie Hungarter7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-08vs CAS.DeAngelisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Pedraza / Wendy Younkin vs Megan Sandidge / Catherine Chan6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Jee / Kendall Ogren vs Rossana Bolla / Terri Jacobsen6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesYuna Kim / Mary Jo Ford vs Heather DeAngelis / Tatjana Gibson6-2, 6-2
2025-09-26vs PW.KupfrianWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Pedraza / Vivian Neto vs Nishi Patel / Amy Munn6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaula Laine / SIUHING LAI vs Allison Kupfrian / Lindsay Rigney7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWendy Younkin / Yuna Kim vs Andrea Agee / Janessa Core6-1, 6-0
2025-09-24vs MCP.IchikawaWon 21
W#1 DoublesYuna Kim / Vivian Neto vs Mamiko Sasabe / Maki Ishizaka6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLori Jee / Kendall Ogren vs Satomi Tagata / Tomoko Tomoyose2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Pedraza / Wendy Younkin vs Rumiko Ho / Virginia Grau6-4, 6-3
2025-09-12vs KF.MurphyWon 30
W#1 DoublesYuna Kim / Vivian Neto vs Rebecca King / Jenn Hartner6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSIUHING LAI / Mary Jo Ford vs Julie Wray / Melissa Raasch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Lennon / Julie Pedraza vs Jocelyn Quick / Glynda Westerbeek6-4, 7-5
2025-09-05vs BENT.StratemeierLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Jee / Yuna Kim vs Rebecca Kotcher / Megan Wagner6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Younkin / Julie Pedraza vs Jolie LeBrun / Andrea Finucane6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSIUHING LAI / Kendall Ogren vs Tracy Jones / Gwen Louis6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-22vs ACP.KeelorWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Pedraza / Wendy Younkin vs Leslie Roper / Michelle Chiaramonte6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPaula Laine / Christine Lennon vs Wendy Chen / Gina Jiampetti4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLori Jee / Mary Jo Ford vs Shelley Dawson / Jeannine McClung6-4, 6-3
2025-08-18vs MD.WadeLost 12
W#1 DoublesVivian Neto / Paula Laine vs Karen Merchant / Jonay Zies6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSIUHING LAI / Mary Jo Ford vs Julia Wade / Katy Rapp4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKendall Ogren / Christine Lennon vs Laurie Godfrey / Kari Moncrief1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Vivian Neto
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Yuna Kim
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.96
Christine Lennon
published 3
2.92
SIUHING LAI
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.92
Julie Pedraza
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.87
Lori Jee
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.61
Wendy Younkin
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.51
Mary Jo Ford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Paula Laine
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.16
Kendall Ogren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Pedraza + Wendy Younkin7260% games+5.8% vs expected
Vivian Neto + Lori Jee13658% games+1.8% vs expected
Vivian Neto + SIUHING LAI4942% games−10.0% vs expected
Wendy Younkin + Lori Jee3737% games−12.6% vs expected
Julie Pedraza + SIUHING LAI8361% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Younkin + Vivian Neto5454% gamesnot enough data
Paula Laine + Yuna Kim4352% gamesnot enough data
Lori Jee + SIUHING LAI4250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Vivian Neto
95W–88L career · 12 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
3
Yuna Kim
121W–74L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Christine Lennon
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
SIUHING LAI
88W–100L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Julie Pedraza
76W–53L career · 16 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Lori Jee
76W–93L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Wendy Younkin
84W–121L career · 11 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Mary Jo Ford
13W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Paula Laine
63W–114L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Kendall Ogren
11W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.