Teams

Team Happy Hour

2025 40 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 3.5 W Thursday

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-27vs FOR FireballsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristie Golla / Stacy Berry vs Kathy Burkholder / Natalie Drayton4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNancy Aubin vs Melissa Wilson7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGinger Cook / Ivette Buentello vs Robin Kozub / Susan Daum1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStaci Neill / Holly Park vs Michelle Pettit / Kelly Grossman6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Sarah Schmidgall
published
3.39
Christie Golla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Renata Goebel
published
3.38
Nancy Aubin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.33
Holly Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Noemi Copeland
published
3.29
Stacy Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Teri Quance
published
3.24
Judy Moeller
published
3.23
Lisa Farris
published
3.15
Kristi Hayduk
published
Ginger Cook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ivette Buentello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Mushrush
published
Misty Wartsbaugh
published
Nicole Ward
published
Staci Neill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Aubin + Renata Goebel6455% games+0.2% vs expected
Nicole Ward + Renata Goebel303 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Berry + Christie Golla213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Schmidgall
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Christie Golla
26W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Renata Goebel
25W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Nancy Aubin
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Holly Park
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Noemi Copeland
62W–63L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Stacy Berry
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Teri Quance
19W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Judy Moeller
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Lisa Farris
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kristi Hayduk
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Ginger Cook
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ivette Buentello
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Mushrush
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Misty Wartsbaugh
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Ward
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Staci Neill
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.