Teams

KY/LOU/DASHTI

2022 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-04-16vs KY/LOU/HOSTETLERLost 01
L#2 DoublesZan Henn / Stefanie Nasca vs Kellee Dicks / Mary Sheridan6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Helen Dashti
published 4
3.92
Sarah Kane-Liu
published
3.85
Zan Henn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Madge Dennis
published
3.82
Betsy Touma
published 4
3.79
Stefanie Nasca
published
3.75
Gloria Hoffmann
published 4
3.75
Amy Dishman
published 4
3.58
Tracey Risk
published
3.27
Robin Snook
published
Rachel Buchheit
published
Robin Miller
published
Stacey Rice
published
Tami Goodbub
published
Whitney McNicol
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Nasca + Helen Dashti10061% games+10.1% vs expected
Stacey Rice + Helen Dashti5062% gamesnot enough data
Helen Dashti + Betsy Touma5061% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Kane-Liu + Helen Dashti314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Kane-Liu + Betsy Touma303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helen Dashti
59W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
Sarah Kane-Liu
86W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Zan Henn
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Madge Dennis
43W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Betsy Touma
26W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Stefanie Nasca
24W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Gloria Hoffmann
25W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Amy Dishman
34W–19L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Tracey Risk
49W–48L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Robin Snook
14W–25L career · no lines in 2022
96%4%<1%
3.27
Rachel Buchheit
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Miller
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacey Rice
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tami Goodbub
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Whitney McNicol
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.