Teams

RFC:MatchMakers6.0:Talbot

2021 ME Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-20vs RFC:Masketeers:HoltWon 30
W#1 DoublesKrystal Talbot / Christian Kryger vs Jenna Ashburn / Jeffrey Legere6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKevin Bridgham / Patricia Martel-Buxton vs Tonya Holt / Dylan Pelletier6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Elwell / Steven Short vs Julie Faure / Subrata Das7-5, 7-5
2021-03-20vs WOOD:TheWoodlands:LacombeWon 21
W#1 DoublesKrystal Talbot / Christian Kryger vs Joanna Pond / Joel Pond6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKevin Bridgham / Kimberly Nappi vs David Hilton / Carol Lambert2-0
L#3 DoublesSteven Short / Eliza Chappell vs David Radin / Sarah Delahanty6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-03-07vs RFC:Masketeers:HoltWon 21
W#1 DoublesKrystal Talbot / Christian Kryger vs Jenna Ashburn / Jeffrey Legere6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEliza Chappell / Dan Zuiches vs Lori Pelletier / Dylan Pelletier7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Nappi / John Higgins vs Julie Faure / Subrata Das4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-07vs WOOD:TheWoodlands:LacombeLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristian Kryger / Krystal Talbot vs Stevoe Woods / Sarah Delahanty7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Otis-Higgins / Kevin Bridgham vs Edward Yoon / Kimberly Oconnell0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Elwell / Steven Short vs David Hilton / Carol Lambert0-6, 3-6
2021-02-20vs RFC:Masketeers:HoltLost 12
W#1 DoublesKimberly Kelly-Brewster / Christian Kryger vs Lori Pelletier / Dylan Pelletier6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPatricia Martel-Buxton / Kevin Bridgham vs Jenna Ashburn / Steve Pelletier6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrea Otis-Higgins / Steven Short vs Ruth Crosby / Brian Arnold4-6, 3-6
2021-02-20vs WOOD:TheWoodlands:LacombeLost 12
W#1 DoublesKrystal Talbot / Christian Kryger vs David Hilton / Carol Lambert7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAndrea Otis-Higgins / John Higgins vs Joel Pond / Joanna Pond0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Martel-Buxton / Dan Zuiches vs Sarah Delahanty / David Radin7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2021-02-06vs RFC:Masketeers:HoltWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristian Kryger / Kimberly Nappi vs Ruth Crosby / Andrew Shur6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDan Zuiches / Eliza Chappell vs Lori Pelletier / Dylan Pelletier6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Elwell / Steven Short vs Julie Faure / Steve Pelletier7-5, 6-4
2021-02-06vs WOOD:TheWoodlands:LacombeLost 03
L#1 DoublesKrystal Talbot / Christian Kryger vs Edward Yoon / Kimberly Oconnell4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJohn Higgins / Pamela Elwell vs Stevoe Woods / Sarah Delahanty2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Bridgham / Patricia Martel-Buxton vs Roy Cobean / Carol Lambert3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:MatchMakers6.0:Talbot44121228230
2RFC:Masketeers:Holt1771739268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Krystal Talbot
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.41
Christian Kryger
usually #1 Doubles 95%, also #2 Doubles 5% · published 3.5
3.32
Kimberly Kelly-Brewster
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.13
Pamela Elwell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Patricia Martel-Buxton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Andrea Otis-Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.79
John Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Eliza Chappell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kimberly Nappi
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krystal Talbot + Christian Kryger22858% games+6.8% vs expected
John Higgins + Andrea Otis-Higgins81744% games−5.7% vs expected
Patricia Martel-Buxton + Christian Kryger3259% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Nappi + John Higgins224 matchesnot enough data
Christian Kryger + Kimberly Kelly-Brewster224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Krystal Talbot
128W–98L career · 14 lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Christian Kryger
182W–114L career · 20 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kimberly Kelly-Brewster
91W–101L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Pamela Elwell
73W–68L career · 8 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.13
Patricia Martel-Buxton
96W–87L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Andrea Otis-Higgins
141W–141L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
John Higgins
37W–56L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
2.79
Eliza Chappell
29W–40L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kimberly Nappi
37W–35L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.