Teams

Pace Island Hale

2025 Duval Combo 50 & Over Summer · 6.5 W Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 3.08 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-27vs Huguenot Jax Beach PerazzoLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Witham / Daiva Nixon vs Irene Perazzo / Tammy Oswald4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Erenberg / Nikki Warner vs Anne Hoover / Michelle Borisenko7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Draughon / Josie Simmons vs Patricia Kiely / Patricia Lombardo2-6, 2-6
2025-09-13vs Southside Matthews 50Split 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Rangeo / Daiva Nixon vs Tammy VonNieda / Holly Depiesse6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDonna Erenberg / Charlotte White vs Susan Sceifers / Wendy Ashby3-6, 1-6
2025-08-29vs Treaty Park AveryWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Rangeo / Charlotte White vs Kim Quinn / Cookie Zimmer5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRosemary Arnold / Holly Fulton vs Trese Martin / Anne Soeder7-5, 1-2
W#3 DoublesLois Andrada-De la Cruz / Elizabeth Britt vs Iryna Conway / Ann Chellemi6-0, 6-0
2025-08-16vs ABTC ColemanWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Rangeo / Daiva Nixon vs Ashley Berg / Roxanne Coleman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Barelare / Holly Fulton vs Heather LeShane / Lauren Joyce3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Witham / Gina Hale vs Kerry Cooke / Elisa Condit3-6, 2-6
2025-08-02vs Duval/BrinkLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Barelare / Daiva Nixon vs Kendall Taylor / Kathy Evans2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRosemary Arnold / Nikki Warner vs Judibelle Roman / Elizabeth Sotomayor1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLois Andrada-De la Cruz / Elizabeth Britt vs Rachelle Stewart / Rebecca Padgett7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-26vs Eagle Harbor JonesLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Rangeo / Daiva Nixon vs Jolene Hamel / Kellie Philips0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori Witham / Kathleen Draughon vs Gail Olsen / Mary Holley2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Britt / Josie Simmons vs Aimee Davidow / Pam Fritz0-6, 0-6
2025-07-19vs Southside Matthews 50Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Erenberg / Gina Hale vs Margaret Radford / Hillary Berry1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKim Barelare / Holly Fulton vs Shari Shuman / Holly Depiesse7-6, 4-1
L#3 DoublesRosemary Arnold / Nancy Stokes vs Lindy Green / Angela Atkins5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-12vs Huguenot Jax Beach PerazzoLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Witham / Gina Hale vs Kari Dodak / Debbie Bucca1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Rangeo / Charlotte White vs Patricia Kiely / Irene Perazzo6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLois Andrada-De la Cruz / Elizabeth Britt vs Margaret Ivers / Anne Hoover6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Lisa Rangeo
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Donna Erenberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Lois Andrada-De la Cruz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Daiva Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Nikki Warner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Charlotte White
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elizabeth Britt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gina Hale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Holly Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Josie Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Draughon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Barelare
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Witham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Stokes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rosemary Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Britt + Lois Andrada-De la Cruz213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Rangeo + Daiva Nixon303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Rangeo
19W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Donna Erenberg
10W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lois Andrada-De la Cruz
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Daiva Nixon
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
Nikki Warner
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Charlotte White
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Britt
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Gina Hale
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Holly Fulton
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Josie Simmons
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Draughon
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Barelare
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Witham
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Stokes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rosemary Arnold
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.