Teams

Sherwood superstars

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WD

15 players · average NTRP 4.06 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Madison Ashton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Alisha Shohet
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.89
Michelle Nardiello
published
3.82
Athene Durrant
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.78
Monica Bjork
published
3.64
Nina Prestidge
published
3.64
Kathrina Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Margaret Tang
published
3.60
Jamie Culhane
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.54
Kimberly Blackwood
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.48
Alona Kavinoky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Dawn Nelson
published 3.5
3.38
Michele Garber
published
3.32
Jane Turner
published
Parise Livanos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathrina Cruz + Athene Durrant7354% games+4.6% vs expected
Margaret Tang + Athene Durrant3451% games+3.2% vs expected
Alona Kavinoky + Alisha Shohet271355% games−0.7% vs expected
Kimberly Blackwood + Athene Durrant5946% games−4.7% vs expected
Jamie Culhane + Athene Durrant11361% gamesnot enough data
Kathrina Cruz + Alona Kavinoky4444% gamesnot enough data
Jane Turner + Jamie Culhane4352% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Nardiello + Monica Bjork404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Madison Ashton
32W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Alisha Shohet
174W–64L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
Michelle Nardiello
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Athene Durrant
96W–70L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Monica Bjork
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Nina Prestidge
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Kathrina Cruz
221W–229L career · 6 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Margaret Tang
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.61
4
Jamie Culhane
68W–50L career · 11 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Kimberly Blackwood
119W–146L career · 7 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
4
Alona Kavinoky
159W–102L career · 2 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Dawn Nelson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.41
Michele Garber
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
Jane Turner
30W–59L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
Parise Livanos
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.