Teams

Cincinnati Garcia

2025 OH OV SUMMER Career A18&O Cincinnati · 2025 Summer A18&O 4.5 MEN Cincinnati

14 players · average NTRP 4.43 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-08vs Cincinnati NortheyWon 32
W#1 DoublesCristiano Trojani / Eric MacLin vs Alexander Kang / Regis Liou6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMike Bolander vs Edward Mueller4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicholas Herzog / Takuro Yamamoto vs Joseph Patten / Jack Huguenin6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesDonald Speeg vs Kassidy Kase2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Starczynowski / Grant Kimner vs Ryan Cunningham / Adam Bercz6-3, 6-4
2025-07-01vs Cincinnati NortheyWon 32
W#1 DoublesMicah Garcia / Grant Kimner vs John van Lokeren / Adam Bercz6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesGavin Isakov vs Kassidy Kase4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNicholas Herzog / Takuro Yamamoto vs Alexander Kang / Regis Liou6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDaniel Starczynowski vs Joseph Patten6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDonald Speeg / Prescott Drees vs Drew Barzman / Ryan Cunningham6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-24vs Cincinnati NortheyWon 32
W#1 DoublesCristiano Trojani / Nicholas Elleman vs Ronnen Isakov / John van Lokeren5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMicah Garcia vs Kassidy Kase6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonald Speeg / Grant Kimner vs Alexander Kang / Regis Liou7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDaniel Starczynowski vs Jay Woffington6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNicholas Herzog / Takuro Yamamoto vs Clayton Northey / Kendall Lemley6-1, 6-2
2025-06-20vs Cincinnati NortheyLost 23
W#1 DoublesEric MacLin / Cristiano Trojani vs Bradley Tash / John van Lokeren6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDonald Speeg vs Edward Mueller5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGavin Isakov / Daniel Kremp vs Ryan Cunningham / Jay Woffington2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMicah Garcia vs Kassidy Kase2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDaniel Starczynowski / Grant Kimner vs Clayton Northey / Kendall Lemley6-2, 6-2
2025-06-10vs Cincinnati NortheyLost 23
W#1 DoublesGrant Kimner / Donald Speeg vs Alexander Kang / Regis Liou3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMicah Garcia vs Bradley Tash2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTakuro Yamamoto / Eric MacLin vs Ronnen Isakov / Jay Woffington7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesNicholas Elleman vs Edward Mueller2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMike Bolander / Andrew Violette vs Drew Barzman / Jack Huguenin6-7, 2-6
2025-06-03vs Cincinnati NortheyLost 14
W#1 DoublesCristiano Trojani / Eric MacLin vs Ronnen Isakov / Joseph Patten6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDaniel Starczynowski vs Edward Mueller5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMicah Garcia / Gavin Isakov vs Alexander Kang / Regis Liou3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMike Bolander vs Clayton Northey2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPrescott Drees / Takuro Yamamoto vs Ryan Cunningham / Benito Trojani2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 Summer A18&O 4.5 MEN Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Cristiano Trojani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.41
Micah Garcia
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.38
Grant Kimner
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Andrew Violette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Daniel Starczynowski
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.18
Donald Speeg
usually #2 Doubles 20%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.09
Eric MacLin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Nicholas Elleman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Gavin Isakov
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Daniel Kremp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Bolander
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nicholas Herzog
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Prescott Drees
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Takuro Yamamoto
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicholas Herzog + Takuro Yamamoto303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cristiano Trojani
15W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.50
Micah Garcia
19W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Grant Kimner
15W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Andrew Violette
2W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Daniel Starczynowski
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Donald Speeg
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Eric MacLin
16W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
4.09
Nicholas Elleman
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
4.09
4
Gavin Isakov
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Daniel Kremp
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mike Bolander
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas Herzog
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Prescott Drees
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Takuro Yamamoto
6W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.