Teams

KNO RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBarb Richards vs Lisa Anderson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-20vs SS-H GREYWon 20
W#1 DoublesIlana Bellowe / Barb Richards vs Shamiree Dillman / Whitney Baylor6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Muller / Linda Prudhomme vs Jennifer Lobb / Cheryl Jones6-1, 6-3
2024-05-18vs LTFC BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Lori Roach vs Colette Laporte / Emily Marle4-6, 4-6
2024-05-13vs KC-RH YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Muller / Barb Richards vs Cari Eversman / Allison Rooney1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Sheila Edwards vs Amanda Mueller / Julie Madison6-7, 3-6
2024-04-27vs HW BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesBarb Richards vs Laurie McElroy5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-15vs SS-D TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Muller / Barb Richards vs Morgan Walton / Holly Schoolcraft6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Jessica Hunt vs Brittany Norris / Eli Boone3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Jenni Young
published
3.03
Sheila Edwards
published
2.79
Barb Richards
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.73
Jessica Hunt
published
2.73
Jennifer Muller
published
2.71
Jacqueline Schultz
published
2.65
Linda Prudhomme
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Jodi Page
published
Ilana Bellowe
published
Lori Roach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Muller + Linda Prudhomme9652% games−2.8% vs expected
Jessica Hunt + Linda Prudhomme2339% games−10.7% vs expected
Jodi Page + Jenni Young213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenni Young
35W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
Sheila Edwards
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Barb Richards
94W–77L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Jessica Hunt
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Jennifer Muller
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.73
Jacqueline Schultz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Linda Prudhomme
88W–90L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.65
Jodi Page
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.56
Ilana Bellowe
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Roach
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.