Teams

Lafayette - Josa

40 & Over Adult Local At State - Men · 4.5M (40&Over)

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-17vs Baton Rouge - LighSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPaul Anderson / Kyle Nunez vs Michael Leachman / Christopher Fitzgerald6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJim Bourgeois vs William Douglass6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesErich Mosing / Jonathan Goodwin vs Collin Sutton / John Donadieu6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJason Crockett / Scott Jordan vs Chris Sutton / Michael Larkin1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-17vs Baton Rouge - LighSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJim Bourgeois / Jeff Josa vs Collin Sutton / Chris Sutton3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJason Crockett vs Billy Leach6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Anderson / Ben Pok vs William Douglass / John Scalise6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKyle Nunez / Jonathan Goodwin vs Christopher Fitzgerald / Pat Ferry4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-16vs Baton Rouge - LighWon 31
W#1 DoublesJim Bourgeois / Ben Pok vs John Scalise / Michael Leachman6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJason Crockett vs William Douglass6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Anderson / Brandon Sattler vs Michael Larkin / John Donadieu4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKyle Nunez / Jeff Josa vs Chris Sutton / Collin Sutton3-6, 3-6
2026-05-16vs Baton Rouge - LighSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJonathan Goodwin / Ben Pok vs Chris Sutton / Collin Sutton3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJim Bourgeois vs Billy Leach7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Anderson / Kyle Nunez vs Pat Ferry / John Donadieu6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesScott Jordan / Jeff Josa vs Michael Leachman / Christopher Fitzgerald2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5M (40&Over)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lafayette - Josa319718143
2Baton Rouge - Ligh137920151

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Jim Bourgeois
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Jason Crockett
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Brandon Sattler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Kyle Nunez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.97
Jonathan Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.89
Ben Pok
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Paul Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.81
Jeff Josa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Joseph Puhekker
published
Scott Graves
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jim Bourgeois
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Jason Crockett
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Brandon Sattler
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Kyle Nunez
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.02
Jonathan Goodwin
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Ben Pok
37W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
Paul Anderson
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.87
Jeff Josa
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.81
Joseph Puhekker
17W–7L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Scott Graves
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.