Teams

2023 18&Over- Guayama Ruth Rosario

Adult 18 & Over 2023 · 2023 18 & Over Women 2.5 III

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-14vs 2023 18&Over- OrroWon 10
W#2 DoublesLizbeth Blasini / Ruth Rosario vs Maria I Ortiz / Arantza Gonzalez Gomez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-27vs 2023 18&Over- Caguas StephanieLost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Rosario / Diana Rodriguez vs Glenda Medina Rios / Stephanie Polanco4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-20vs 2023 18&Over- Caguas RafaelLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Ruttell / Ruth Rosario vs Yaren Pena / Abigail Moreno Lopez4-6, 3-6
2023-04-30vs 2023 18&Over- Caguas RafaelLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana Rodriguez / Ruth Rosario vs Yaren Pena / Valeria M Santos Colom5-7, 2-6
2023-04-22vs 2023 18&Over- OrroWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Ruttell / Ruth Rosario vs Yamila Ramirez / Cristina Torres Figueroa6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 18 & Over Women 2.5 III have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Diana Rodriguez
published 3
2.61
Nissette Rodriguez
published
2.59
Lizbeth Blasini
published
2.46
Ruth Rosario
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.34
Barbara Ruttell
published 3
2.25
Marynes Colon
published
Jailene Ferrer
published 2.5
Sofia Frau Rivera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karla Michelle Ledee Ramirez + Nissette Rodriguez9262% games+6.5% vs expected
Ruth Rosario + Diana Rodriguez3357% games+4.1% vs expected
Lizbeth Blasini + Diana Rodriguez2345% games−3.4% vs expected
Marynes Colon + Diana Rodriguez044 matchesnot enough data
Lizbeth Blasini + Marynes Colon213 matchesnot enough data
Lizbeth Blasini + Barbara Ruttell123 matchesnot enough data
Marynes Colon + Jailene Ferrer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karla Michelle Ledee Ramirez
25W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Diana Rodriguez
45W–25L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Nissette Rodriguez
47W–9L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Lizbeth Blasini
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59
Ruth Rosario
22W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.46
3
Barbara Ruttell
23W–16L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.34
Marynes Colon
22W–19L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Jailene Ferrer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sofia Frau Rivera
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.